1,724
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Vaginal breech delivery at term and neonatal morbidity and mortality – a population-based cohort study in Sweden

, , , , &
Pages 265-270 | Received 18 Jun 2017, Accepted 07 Sep 2017, Published online: 22 Sep 2017

References

  • Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383
  • Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;21(7):CD000166.
  • Socialstyrelsen, Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare [Internet]. Statistics on Swedish births. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Lists/Artikelkatalog/Attachments/20009/2015-12-27.pdf
  • Grivell RM, Barreto MP, Dodd JM. The influence of intrapartum factors on risk of uterine rupture and successful vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin Perinatol. 2011;38(2):265–275.
  • Cho CE, Norman M. Cesarean section and development of the immune system in the offspring. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):249–254.
  • Hellsten C, Lindqvist PG, Olofsson P. Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(2):122–128.
  • Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):1002–1011.
  • Doyle NM, Riggs JW, Ramin SM, et al. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2005;22(6):325–328.
  • Vistad I, Klungsøyr K, Albrechtsen S, et al. Neonatal outcome of singleton term breech deliveries in Norway from 1991 to 2011. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(9):997–1004.
  • Rietberg CC, Elferink-Stinkens PM, Brand R, et al. Term breech presentation in the Netherlands from 1995 to 1999: mortality and morbidity in relation to the mode of delivery of 33824 infants. BJOG. 2003;110(6):604–609.
  • Swedish Collaborative Breech Study Group. Term breech delivery in Sweden: mortality relative to fetal presentation and planned mode of delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84(6):593–601.
  • Berhan Y, Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG. 2016;123(1):49–57.
  • Collea JV, Chein C, Quilligan EJ. The randomized management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;137(2):235–244.
  • Gimovsky ML, Wallace RL, Schifrin BS, et al. Randomized management of the nonfrank breechpresentation at term: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146(1):34–40.
  • Bin YS, Roberts CL, Ford JB, et al. Outcomes of breech birth by mode of delivery: a population linkage study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;56(5):453–459.
  • Mollberg M, Hagberg H, Bager B, et al. Risk factors for obstetric brachial plexus palsy among neonates delivered by vacuum extraction. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):913–918.
  • Tunde-Byass MO, Hannah ME. Breech vaginal delivery at or near term. Semin Perinatol 2003;27:34–45.
  • Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study. J Perinat Med. 2016 Apr 6.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Management of breech presentation. Green – Top Guideline. March 2017;20b.
  • Chamberlain G. Turnbull’s obstetrics. 2 ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1995. p. 668–671.
  • Bjellmo S, Andersen GL, Martinussen MP, et al. Is vaginal breech delivery associated with higher risk for perinatal death and cerebral palsy compared with vaginal cephalic birth? Registry-based cohort study in Norway. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e014979.
  • Källén K, Serenius F, Westgren M, et al. Impact of obstetric factors on outcome of extremely preterm births in Sweden: prospective population-based observational study (EXPRESS). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(11):1203–1214.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.