Investigation of possible maternal and fetal factors which affect umbilical coiling index

References

• Gluckman PD. Endocrine and nutritional regulation of prenatal growth. Acta Paediatr. 1997;423:153–157; discussion 158.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer FA, Laver-Rudich Z, Tanenbaum R. Evidence for a mechanical coupling of glycoprotein microfibrils with collagen fibrils in Wharton’s jelly. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1983;755:376–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto T, Ono H, Saito Y. Electron microscopic histochemical studies on the localization of hyaluronic acid in Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord [in Japanese]. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;48:501–507.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H-S, Hung SC, Peng ST, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the Wharton’s jelly of the human umbilical cord. Stem Cells. 2004;22:1330–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds HW. The spiral twist of the normal umbilical cord in twins and in singletons. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;67:102–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong TH, Jarles DL, Vega JS, et al. The umbilical coiling index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:29–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin GA, Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barness E. Abnormal umbilical cord coiling is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000;3:462–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk CC, Franx A, de Laat MWM, et al. The umbilical coiling index in normal pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2002;11:280–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sahoo K, Mahajan A, Shaha P, et al. Evaluation of umbilical coiling index as a predictor of pregnancy outcome. Int J Health Sci Res IJHSR. 2015;5:92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Narayanan A, Ballal P, Shetty N, et al. Antenatal umbilical cord parameters and perinatal outcome. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5:1211–1215.
   Google Scholar
• Tohma YA, Altay MM, Turgut D, et al. Second trimester umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2016;20:3.
   Google Scholar
• Stanek J. Association of coexisting morphological umbilical cord abnormality and clinical cord compromise with hypoxic and thrombotic placental histology. Virchows Arch. 2016;468:723–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu MY, Madathil S, Miller S, et al. Fetal haemodynamic assessment in a case of late-onset intrauterine growth restriction by phase contrast MRI and T2 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal A, Nanda S, Sen J. Antenatal umbilical coiling index as a predictor of perinatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:763–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:213689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyson RW, Staat BC. The intrauterine growth-restricted fetus and placenta evaluation. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32:166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Faridi MMA, Krishnan J. Umbilical coiling index. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56:315–319.
   Google Scholar
• de Laat MWM, Franx A, Bots ML, et al. Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:1049–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashanian M, Akbarian A, Kouhpayehzadeh J. The umbilical coiling index and adverse perinatal outcome. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;95:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope B, Hokin B, Grant R. Effect of maternal iron status on the number of CD34+ stem cells harvested from umbilical cord blood. Transfusion. 2014;54:1876–1880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz L, Peter A, Poets CF, et al. A review of cord blood concentrations of iron status parameters to define reference ranges for preterm infants. Neonatology. 2013;104:194–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sá SA, Willner E, Duraes Pereira TA, et al. Anemia in pregnancy: impact on weight and in the development of anemia in newborn. Nutr Hosp. 2015;32:2071–2079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao J, Lou J, Rao R, et al. Maternal serum ferritin concentration is positively associated with newborn iron stores in women with low ferritin status in late pregnancy. J Nutr. 2012;142:2004–2009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadipour R, Norimah AK, Poh BK, et al. Haemoglobin and serum ferritin levels in newborn babies born to anaemic Iranian women: a cross-sectional study in an Iranian hospital. Pak J Nutr. 2010;9:562–566.
   Google Scholar
• Drukker L, Hants Y, Farkash R, et al. Iron deficiency anemia at admission for labor and delivery is associated with an increased risk for cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Transfusion. 2015;55:2799–2806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner E, Bar J, Fainstein N, et al. Intraoperative findings, placental assessment and neonatal outcome in emergent cesarean deliveries for non-reassuring fetal heart rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil NS, Kulkarni SR, Lohitashwa R. Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2013;7:1675–1677.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adinma JI. The umbilical cord: a study of 1000 consecutive deliveries. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud. 1993;38:175–179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayburn WF, Beynen A, Brinkman DL. Umbilical cord length and intrapartum complications. Obstet Gynecol. 1981;57:450–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predanic M, Perni SC. Absence of a relationship between umbilical cord thickness and coiling patterns. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24:1491–1496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar