Uterine artery Doppler ultrasound in second pregnancy with previous elective cesarean section*

References

• Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer JA, et al. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Health Rep. 2010;30:1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho GJ, Kim LY, Min KJ, et al. Prior cesarean section is associated with increased preeclampsia risk in a subsequent pregnancy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennare R, Tucker G, Heard A, et al. Risks of adverse outcomes in the next birth after a first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(2 Pt 1):270–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. First‐birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(5 Pt 1):765–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura Laveriano WR, Redondo CE. Obstetric outcomes in the second birth of women with a previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study from Peru. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2013;35(4):148–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, et al. Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11(1):95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362(9398):1779–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flo K, Widnes C, Vårtun Å, et al. Blood flow to the scarred gravid uterus at 22–24 weeks of gestation. BJOG. 2014;121(2):210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albaiges G, Missfelder-Lobos H, Lees C, et al. One-stage screening for pregnancy complications by color Doppler assessment of the uterine arteries at 23 weeks’ gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(4):559–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkaya U, Ozkan S, Ozeren S, et al. Doppler examination of uteroplacental circulation in early pregnancy: can it predict adverse outcome? J Clin Ultrasound. 2007;35(7):382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Misra R, Ghosh UK, et al. Comparison of foetomaternal circulation in normal pregnancies and pregnancy induced hypertension using color Doppler studies. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2014;58(3):284–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olofsson P, Laurini RN, Marsál K. A high uterine artery pulsatility index reflects a defective development of placental bed spiral arteries in pregnancies complicated by hypertension and fetal growth retardation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993;49(3):161–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barati M, Shahbazian N, Ahmadi L, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of uterine artery Doppler sonography for the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(6):515–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter EB, Goetzinger K, Tuuli MG, et al. Evaluating the optimal definition of abnormal first-trimester uterine artery Doppler parameters to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2015;34(7):1265–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maulik D Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Callen PW. Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier Health Sciences; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler I, Weiner Z, Itskovitz J. Systolic or diastolic notch in uterine artery blood flow velocity waveforms in hypertensive pregnant patients: relationship to outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(2):277–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowicz JS, editor. First-trimester ultrasound: A comprehensive guide. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Winn HN, Hobbins JC, editors Clinical maternal-fetal medicine. New York (NY): CRC Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard R, Arends LR, Steegers EA, et al. Second- and third-trimester placental hemodynamics and the risks of pregnancy complications the generation R Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(8):743–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geipel A, Ludwig M, Germer U, et al. Uterine artery Doppler velocimetry and the outcome of pregnancies resulting from ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1397–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Filho OdO, Nardozza LMM, Araujo Júnior E, et al. Repercussions of previous cesarean uterine scar at uterine arteries Doppler velocimetry between the 26th and 32nd gestational weeks. Radiol Bras. 2011;44(3):163–166.
   Google Scholar
• Horsager R, Roberts S, Rogers V, et al Williams obstetrics, study guide. New York (NY): McGrawHill Professional; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez O, Figueras F, Fernández S, et al. Reference ranges for uterine artery mean pulsatility index at 11–41 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(2):128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton TR. A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda’s chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatr. 2003;3:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharaghani R, Cheraghi Z, Okhovat Esfahani BO, et al. Prevalence of preeclampsia and eclampsia in Iran. Arch Iran Med. 2016;19(1):64–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergin RN, Yayla M. Uterine artery pulsatility index and diastolic notch laterality according to the placental location. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2015;42(5):640–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran Erdolu MD, Köşüş A, Köşüş N, et al. Relationship between placental localisation, birth weight, umbilical Doppler parameters, and foetal sex. Turk J Med Sci. 2014;44(6):1114–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, et al. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):402–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar