References
- Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1267–1278.
- Gilbert SA, Grobman WA, Landon MB, et al. Lifetime cost-effectiveness of trial of labor after cesarean in the United States. Value Health. 2013;16(6):953–964.
- Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
- Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):967–981.
- Hoskins IA, Gomez JL. Correlation between maximum cervical dilatation at cesarean delivery and subsequent vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89(4):591–593.
- Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. Should we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor? Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):652–655.
- Abildgaard H, Ingerslev MD, Nickelsen C, et al. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia – effect on subsequent trial of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(2):193–197.
- Duff P, Southmayd K, Read JA. Outcome of trial of labor in patients with a single previous low transverse cesarean section for dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;71(3 Pt 1):380–384.
- Lewkowitz AK, Nakagawa S, Thiet MP, et al. Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):861.e1–861.e5.
- Grobman WA, Bailit J, Lai Y, et al. Association of the duration of active pushing with obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(4):667–673.
- Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, et al. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(1):57–67.