References
- Menacker F, Hamilton BE. Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 2010;35:1–8.
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, et al. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–64.
- Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:698–704.
- Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:287–293.
- Caughey AB, Nicholson JM, Cheng YW, et al. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:700–705.
- Little SE, Caughey AB. Induction of labor and cesarean: what is the true relationship? Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;58:269–281.
- Norwitz ER, Snegovskikh VV, Caughey AB. Prolonged pregnancy: when should we intervene? Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;50:547–557.
- Caughey AB, Musci TJ. Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:57–62.
- Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief. 2014;155:1–8.
- Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, et al. Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128:1357–1364.
- Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:702–706.
- Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hellmann J, et al. Induction of labor as compared with serial antenatal monitoring in post-term pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. The Canadian multicenter post-term pregnancy trial group. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1587–1592.
- Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1312–1318.
- Daskalakis G, Zacharakis D, Simou M, et al. Induction of labor versus expectant management for pregnancies beyond 41 weeks. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:173–176.
- Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105:690–697.
- Johnson DP, Davis NR, Brown AJ. Risk of cesarean delivery after induction at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:1565–1569.
- Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, et al. Predictors of cesarean delivery in women undergoing labor induction with a foley balloon. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1000–1004.
- Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, et al. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1003–1010.
- Heimstad R, Skogvoll E, Mattsson LA, et al. Induction of labor or serial antenatal fetal monitoring in postterm pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:609–617.
- Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:917–922.
- Levine LD, Hirshberg A, Srinivas SK. Term induction of labor and risk of cesarean delivery by parity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:1232–1236.
- Carpenter JR. Intrapartum management of the obese gravida. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;59:172–179.
- Clinicaltrials.Gov [Internet]; [cited 2017 Oct 22]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01990612?cond=induction+in+nulliparous+women+at +39+weeks&rank =1