Foley catheter with simultaneous oxytocin on labor induction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

References

• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2003. Natl Vital Stat Rep Centers Dis Contr Prev Natl Center Health Stat Natl Vital Stat Syst. 2005;54(2):1–116.
   Google Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Karlström A, Nystedt A. Women’s experiences of induction of labour – findings from a Swedish regional study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;51(2):151–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speert H. Obstetrics and gynecology in America: a history. Chicago:ACOG;1980.
   Google Scholar
• Embrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967;74(1):44–48.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boulvain M, Kelly AJ, Lohse C, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Guinn DA, Goepfert AR, Christine M, et al. Extra-amniotic saline, laminaria, or prostaglandin E(2) gel for labor induction with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(1):106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vengalil SR, Guinn DA, Olabi NF, et al. A randomized trial of misoprostol and extra-amniotic saline infusion for cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91(5 Pt 1):774–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Tovbin J, et al. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with extraamniotic catheter balloon: clinical experience and review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51(10):621–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sciscione AC, McCullough H, Manley JS, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1 Pt 1):55–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirse MJ, Thiery M, Parewijck W, et al. Chronic stimulation of uterine prostaglandin synthesis during cervical ripening before the onset of labor. Prostaglandins. 1983;25(5):671–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe Y, Manabe A, Takahashi A. F prostaglandin levels in amniotic fluid during balloon-induced cervical softening and labor at term. Prostaglandins. 1982;23(2):247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettker CM, Pocock SB, Smok DP, et al. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1320–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly KA, Kohari KS, Rekawek P, et al. A randomized trial of Foley balloon induction of labor trial in nulliparas (FIAT-N). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):392.e1–392.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine LD, Downes KL, Elovitz MA, et al. Mechanical and pharmacologic methods of labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(6):1357–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly KA, Kohari KS, Factor SH, et al. A randomized trial of foley balloon induction of labor trial in multiparas (FIAT-M). Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(11):1108–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen CN, Grant G, Berghella V, et al. Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):1046–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Khouly NI. A prospective randomized trial comparing Foley catheter, oxytocin, and combination Foley catheter-oxytocin for labour induction with unfavourable cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;37(3):309–314.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):690–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–397.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sciscione AC. Methods of cervical ripening and labor induction: mechanical. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57(2):369–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (3):CD001233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry KG Jr, Larmon JE, May WL, et al. Cervical ripening: a randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and an intracervical balloon catheter combined with intravaginal dinoprostone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178(6):1333–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JH, Huang WH, Rumney PJ, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter, and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(4):1031–1035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciscione AC, Nguyen L, Manley J, et al. A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(4):603–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs AR, Fuchs F, Husslein P, et al. Oxytocin receptors and human parturition: a dual role for oxytocin in the initiation of labor. Science. 1982;215(4538):1396–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a transcervical Foley catheter as a source of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):539–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar