283
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Management of fetal growth restriction using the contraction stress test: a case-control study

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3221-3225 | Received 07 Feb 2018, Accepted 29 Mar 2018, Published online: 18 Apr 2018

References

  • Powers WF, Kiely JL. The risks confronting twins: a national perspective. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):456–461.
  • Sassoon DA, Castro LC, Davis JL, et al. Perinatal outcome in triplet versus twin gestations. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75(5):817–820.
  • Alexander JM, Hammond KR, Steinkampf MP. Multifetal reduction of high-order multiple pregnancy: comparison of obstetrical outcome with nonreduced twin gestations. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(6):1201–1203.
  • Silver RK, Helfand BT, Russell TL, et al. Multifetal reduction increases the risk of preterm delivery and fetal growth restriction in twins: a case-control study. Fertil Steril. 1997;67(1):30–33.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, ACOG Joint Editorial Committee. Multiplegestation: complicated twin, triplet, and highorder multifetal pregnancy. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 56. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(4):869–883.
  • Machin GA. Velamentous cord insertion in monochorionic twin gestation. An added risk factor. J Reprod Med. 1997;42(12):785–789.
  • Freeman RK. The use of the oxytocin challenge test for antepartum clinical evaluation of uteroplacental respiratory function. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975;121(4):481–489.
  • Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. I. Risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity according to antepartum fetal heart rate test results. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143(7):771–777.
  • Freeman RK, Anderson G, Dorchester W. A prospective multi-institutional study of antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. II. Contraction stress test versus nonstress test for primary surveillance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;143(7):778–781.
  • Nageotte MP, Towers CV, Asrat T, et al. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(2):231–234.
  • Minakami H, Maeda T, Fujii T, et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan: Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) and Japan Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (JAOG) 2014 edition. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(6):1469–1499.
  • Signore C, Freeman RK, Spong CY. Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):687–701.
  • Clark SL, Gimovsky ML, Miller FC. The scalp stimulation test: a clinical alternative to fetal scalp blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148(3):274–277.
  • Smith CV, Nguyen HN, Phelan JP, et al. Intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being: a comparison of fetal acoustic stimulation with acid–base determinations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986;155(4):726–728.
  • Manning FA, Snijders R, Harman CR, et al. Fetal biophysical profile score. VI. Correlation with antepartum umbilical venous fetal pH. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169(4):755–763.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.