Predictors of cesarean delivery in cervical ripening and labor induction with Foley catheter

References

• Ten Eikelder ML, Oude Rengerink K, Jozwiak M, et al. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1619–1628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi Y, Levy M, Weiner E, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after failed cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 followed by Foley balloon catheter. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(19):3229–3233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Snowden JM, et al. Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:502.e1–502.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffner LJ, Elkin E, Fretts RC. Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towner D, Castro MA, Eby-Wilkens E, et al. Effect of mode of delivery in nulliparous women on neonatal intracranial injury. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1709–1714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Leedy JG, DiSilvestro AJ, Repke JT, et al. Reduction in the cesarean delivery rate after obstetric care consensus guideline implementation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128:145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization Human Reproduction Programme. WHO Statement on caesarean section rates. Reprod Health Matters. 2015;23:149–150.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott SJ, Brick A, Layte R, et al. National variation in caesarean section rates: a cross sectional study in Ireland. Plos One. 2016;11:e0156172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning FA, Platt LD, Sipos L. Antepartum fetal evaluation: development of a fetal biophysical profile. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;136:787–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:192–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:690–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahratian A, Zhang J, Troendle JF, et al. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:698–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:1511–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patro-Małysza J, Marciniak B, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, et al. Effectiveness of intracervical catheter as a labor preinduction method. Ginekol Pol. 2010;81:31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Sundaram V, Kaimal AJ, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009;176:1–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholson JM, Cronholm P, Kellar LC, et al. The association between increased use of labor induction and reduced rate of cesarean delivery. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009;18:1747–1758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cammu H, Martens G, Ruyssinck G, et al. Outcome after elective labor induction in nulliparous women: a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:240–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:917–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezebialu IU, Eke AC, Eleje GU, et al. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:CD010762.
   Google Scholar
• Ennen CS, Bofill JA, Magann EF, et al. Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;67:113–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Omar R, et al. Clinical and ultrasound parameters to predict the risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:227–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KH, Hong JS, Shin DM, et al. Prediction of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2009;35:301–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson KA, Carr DB, Easterling TR. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:299.e1–299.e4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenthal DB, Jiang X, Strobino DM. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, et al. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89:1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinberg EM, Wood RA, Chambers RB. Elective induction of labor in multiparous women. Does it increase the risk of cesarean section? J Reprod Med. 2002;47:399–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Ramos L, Olivier F, Delke I, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management for postterm pregnancies: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:1312–1318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney S, Shaffer BL, Cheng YW, et al. Predictors of cesarean delivery in women undergoing labor induction with a Foley balloon. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28:1000–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, et al. Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:813–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy AL, Gonzalez JL, Rappaport VJ, et al. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies. J Reprod Med. 2002;47:931–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar