https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3455-0660
References
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(2 Pt 1):450–463.
- National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1279–1295.
- Flamm BL, Geiger AM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: an admission scoring system. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(6):907–910.
- Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
- Troyer LR, Parisi VM. Obstetric parameters affecting success in a trial of labor: designation of a scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167(4 Pt 1):1099–1104.
- Smith GCS, White IR, Pell JP, et al. Predicting cesarean section and uterine rupture among women attempting vaginal birth after prior cesarean section. PLoS Med. 2005;2(9):e252.
- Hashima JN, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a prenatal scoring tool. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(5):e22–e23.
- Pickhardt MG, Martin JN Jr., Meydrech EF, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: are there useful and valid predictors of success or failure? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(6):1811–1819.
- Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Does information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean? Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(10):693–701.
- Jakobi P, Weissman A, Peretz BA, et al. Evaluation of prognostic factors for vaginal delivery after cesarean section. J Reprod Med. 1993;38(9):729–733.
- Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Tanos V, et al. Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):192–198.
- Macones GA, Hausman N, Edelstein R, et al. Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(3):409–413.
- Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Hendler I, et al. Modified Bishop’s score and induction of labor in patients with a previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1644–1648.
- Eden KB, McDonagh M, Denman MA, et al. New insights on vaginal birth after cesarean: can it be predicted? Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(4):967–981.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after previous Caesarean Birth. Guideline No. 45; 2007, February. [cited 2017 Jan 10]. Available from: http://www.rcog.org.uk/womens-health/clinical-guidance/birth-after-previous-caesarean-birth-green-top-45.
- Figueras F, Savchev S, Triunfo S, et al. An integrated model with classification criteria to predict small-for-gestational-age fetuses at risk of adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):279–285.
- Grobman WA, Terkildsen MF, Soltysik RC, et al. Predicting outcome after emergent cerclage using classification tree analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2008;25(7):443–448.
- De Oña J, De Oña R, Calvo FJ. A classification tree approach to identify key factors of transit service quality. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(12):11164–11171.
- Chauhan SP, Grobman WA, Gherman RA, et al. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(2):332–346.
- Shamley KT, Landon MB. Accuracy and modifying factors for ultrasonographic determination of fetal weight at term. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84(6):926–930.
- Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3 Pt 2):1016–1023.
- Sebastián Manzanares G, Angel Santalla H, Irene Vico Z, et al. Abnormal maternal body mass index and obstetric and neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(3):308–312.