Cytogenetic abnormalities in couples with a history of primary and secondary recurrent miscarriage: a Brazilian Multicentric Study

References

• WHO. Recommended definitions, terminology and format for statistical tables related to the perinatal period and use of a new certificate for cause of perinatal deaths. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1977;56:247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(1):63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Mouzon J de, et al. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(5):1520–1524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Farquharson RG, Christiansen OB, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for the investigation and medical treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(9):2216–2222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hachem H, Crepaux V, May-Panloup P, et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss: current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Shapira E, Ratzon R, Shoham-Vardi I, et al. Primary vs. secondary recurrent pregnancy loss – epidemiological characteristics, etiology, and next pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med. 2012;40(4):389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharapel AT, Tharapel SA, Bannerman RM. Recurrent pregnancy losses and parental chromosome abnormalities: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92(9):899–914.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dutta UR, Rajitha P, Pidugu VK, et al. Cytogenetic abnormalities in 1162 couples with recurrent miscarriages in southern region of India: report and review. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(2):145–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson MD, Sierra S. Reproductive outcomes in recurrent pregnancy loss associated with a parental carrier of a structural chromosome rearrangement. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(4):1076–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaanderen W. Recurrent miscarriage: guidelines could be improved. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1344–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atik RB, Christiansen OB, Elson J, et al. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open. 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoy004
   Google Scholar
• De Krom G, Arens YH, Coonen E, et al. Recurrent miscarriage in translocation carriers: no differences in clinical characteristics between couples who accept and couples who decline PGD. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):484–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677–685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghezal H, Hidar S, Mougou S, et al. Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in couples with recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(3):721–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe B, Umrigar A, Tsien F. Chromosome preparation from cultured cells. J Vis Exp. 2014;83(83):e50203.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan-Jordan J. Simons, Annet; Schmid, M (Michael). International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature. ISCN: an international system for human cytogenomic nomenclature. Basel: Karger; 2016; p. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Toth B, Würfel W, Bohlmann MK, et al. Recurrent miscarriage: diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Guideline of the DGGG (S1-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/050, December 2013). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015;75(11):1117–1129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The investigations and treatments of couples with recurrent first-trimester and Second Trimester miscarriage. Green-top Guidel. Vol. 17. London, UK: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mozdarani H, Meybodi AM, Zari-Moradi S. A cytogenetic study of couples with recurrent spontaneous abortions and infertile patients with recurrent IVF/ICSI failure. Indian J Hum Genet. 2008;14(1):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campanho Cde L, Heinrich JK, Couto E, et al. Subfertility phenotype, chromosome polymorphism and conception failures. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011;33(5):246–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tunç E, Tanrıverdi N, Demirhan O, et al. Chromosomal analyses of 1510 couples who have experienced recurrent spontaneous abortions. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(4):414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss A, Rosa RF, Dibi RP, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in couples with history of recurrent abortion. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009;31(2):68–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maithripala S, Durland U, Havelock J, et al. Prevalence and treatment choices for couples with recurrent pregnancy loss due to structural chromosomal anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018;40(6):655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglayan AO, Ozyazgan I, Demiryilmaz F, et al. Are heterochromatin polymorphisms associated with recurrent miscarriage? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):774–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Zhang Y, Yu Y, et al. Effect of chromosomal polymorphisms of different genders on fertilization rate of fresh IVF-ICSI embryo transfer cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(4):436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pylyp LY, Spinenko LO, Verhoglyad NV, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with oligozoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(5):729–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin FI, Yilmaz Z, Yuregir OO, et al. Chromosome heteromorphisms: an impact on infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2008;25(5):191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purandare H, Fernandes NV, Deshmukh SV, et al. Heterochromatic variations and Pregnancy losses in Humans. Int J Hum Genet. 2011;11(3):167–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbaş H, Isi H, Oral D, et al. Chromosome heteromorphisms are more frequent in couples with recurrent abortions. Genet Mol Res. 2012;11(4):3847–3851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghbani F, Mirzaee S, Hassanzadeh-Nazarabadi M. Association of heteromorphism of chromosome 9 and recurrent abortion (ultrasound diagnosed blighted ovum): A case report. Iran J Reprod Med. 2014;12(5):357–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baidyanath Kumar NS, Kumar A. Chromosomal heteromorphisms and karyotype abnormalities in humans. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2017;6(5):2940–2953.
   Google Scholar
• Morales R, Lledó B, Ortiz JA, et al. Chromosomal polymorphic variants increase aneuploidies in male gametes and embryos. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2016;62(5):317–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpen G, Endow S. Meiosis: chromosome behaviour and spindle dynamics. In: Endow SA, Glover DM, editors. Dynamics of cell division. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Verma RS. Heterochromatin: molecular and structural aspects. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kosyakova N, Grigorian A, Liehr T, et al. Heteromorphic variants of chromosome 9. Mol Cytogenet. 2013;6(1):14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genet Med. 2017;19(1):83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar