373
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The presence of amniotic fluid sludge in pregnant women with a short cervix: an independent risk of preterm delivery

, , , &
Pages 920-923 | Received 30 Apr 2018, Accepted 05 Aug 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018

References

  • Nassar AH, Aoun J, Usta IM. Calcium channel blockers for the management of preterm birth: a review. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(1):57–66.
  • Celik E, To M, Gajewska K, et al. Cervical length and obstetric history predict spontaneous preterm birth: development and validation of a model to provide individualized risk assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(5):549–554
  • Bick DD. Born too soon: the global issue of preterm birth. Midwifery. 2012;28(4):341–342.
  • DiGiulio DB. Diversity of microbes in amniotic fluid. Semin Fetal Neonat Med. 2012;17(1):2–11.
  • Andersen HF, Nugent CE, Wanty SD, et al. Prediction of risk for preterm delivery by ultrasonographic measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163(3):859–867.
  • Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
  • Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, et al. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998;12(5):312–317.
  • Hassan SS, Romero R, Berry SM, et al. Patients with an ultrasonographic cervical length < or =15mm have nearly a 50% risk of early spontaneous preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(6):1458–1467.
  • Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Romero R, et al. The prevalence and clinical significance of amniotic fluid “sludge” in patients with preterm labor and intact membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(4):346–352.
  • Vaisbuch E, Romero R, Erez O, et al. The clinical significance of early (<20 weeks) versus late (20–24 weeks) detection of a sonographic short cervix in asymptomatic women in the mid-trimester. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(4):471–481.
  • Bujold E, Pasquier JC, Simoneau J, et al. Intra-amniotic “sludge”, short cervix, and the risk of preterm delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(3):198–202.
  • Romero R, Schaudinn C, Kusanovic JP, et al. Detection of a microbial biofilm in intraamniotic infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198(1):135.e1–135.e5.
  • Kusanovic JP, Espinoza J, Romero R, et al. Clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid “sludge” in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(5):706–714.
  • Boyer A, Cameron L, Munoz-Maldonado Y, et al. Clinical significance of amniotic fluid sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(5):506.e1–506.e9.
  • Ventura W, Nazario C, Ingar J, et al. Risk of impending preterm delivery associated with the presence of amniotic fluid sludge in women in preterm labor with intact membranes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30(2):116–121.
  • Himaya E, Rhalmi N, Girard M, et al. Midtrimester intra-amniotic sludge and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28(10):815–820.
  • Hatanaka AR, Mattar R, Kawanami TE, et al. Amniotic fluid “sludge” is an independent risk factor for preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(1):120–125.
  • Adanir I, Ozyuncu O, Gokmen Karasu AF, et al. Amniotic fluid “sludge”; prevalence and clinical significance of it in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(2):135–140.
  • Romero R, Yeo L, Miranda J, et al. A blueprint for the prevention of preterm birth: vaginal progesterone in women with a short cervix. J Perinat Med. 2013;41(1):27–44.
  • Greco E, Lange A, Ushakov F, et al. Prediction of spontaneous preterm delivery from endocervical length at 11 to 13 weeks. Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(1):84–89.
  • Yoneda N, Yoneda S, Niimi H, et al. Sludge reflects intra-amniotic inflammation with or without microorganisms. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018;79(2):e12807.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.