Qualitative evaluation of a guideline supporting shared decision making for extreme preterm birth

References

• Janvier A, Lorenz JM, Lantos JD. Antenatal counselling for parents facing an extremely preterm birth: limitations of the medical evidence. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101:800–804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercurio MR. The ethics of newborn resuscitation. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33:354–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson DJC. Gestational ageism. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166:567–572.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadow W, Lagatta J, Andrews B, et al. The mathematics of morality for neonatal resuscitation. Clin Perinatol. 2012;39:941–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chervenak FA, McCullough LB. Ethical issues in periviable birth. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37:422–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaempf JW, Tomlinson MW, Campbell B, et al. Counseling pregnant women who may deliver extremely premature infants: medical care guidelines, family choices, and neonatal outcomes. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1509–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Harrison MB, Brouwers M, et al. Facilitating the use of evidence in practice: evaluating and adapting clinical practice guidelines for local use by health care organizations. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002;31:599–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastner M, Estey E, Perrier L, et al. Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review. Implement Sci. 2011;6:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binepal N, Lemyre B, Dunn S, et al. Systematic review and quality appraisal of international guidelines on perinatal care of extremely premature infants. CPR. 2015;11:126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Agree II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839–E842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre B, Daboval T, Dunn S, et al. Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: a prognosis-based guideline. J Perinatol. 2016;36:503–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Légaré F, Zhang P. Barriers and facilitators: strategies for identification and measurement. In: Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: moving from Evidence to Practice. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 121–136
   Google Scholar
• Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD005470–CD005470.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33: 77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015;42:533–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, et al. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, et al. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation – a scoping review. Healthcare. 2016;4:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GP, Lemyre B, Daboval T, et al. Field testing of decision coaching with a decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity. J Perinatol. 2017;37:728–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaempf JW, Dirksen K. Extremely premature birth, informed written consent, and the Greek ideal of sophrosyne. J Perinatol. 2018;38:306–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher K, Martin J, Keller M, et al. European variation in decision-making and parental involvement during preterm birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014;99:F245–F249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabbers MM, Boluyt N, Offringa M. Implementation of an evidence-based guideline on fluid resuscitation: lessons learnt for future guidelines. Eur J Pediatr. 2010;169:749–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenic S, Childerhose JE, Lauzière J, et al. Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations related to implementing the Baby-Friendly initiative (BFI): an integrative review. J Hum Lact. 2012;28:317–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurtzen R, Draaisma J, Hermens R, et al. Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians’ preferences despite guideline. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:1039–1046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munce S, Kastner M, Cramm H, et al. Applying the knowledge to action framework to plan a strategy for implementing breast cancer screening guidelines: an interprofessional perspective. J Canc Educ. 2013;28:481–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Watt S, Escaf M, et al. Medical assistance in dying – implementing a hospital-based program in Canada. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:2082–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings J. Committee on fetus and newborn. Antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2015;136:588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre B, Moore G. Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Heal. 2017;22:334–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD001431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillen U, Kirpalani H. Ethical implications of the use of decision aids for antenatal counseling at the limits of gestational viability. Semin Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;23:25–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus SE, Tetroe J, Bhattacharyya O, et al. Monitoring knowledge use and evaluating outcomes. In: Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. Knowledge Translation in Health Care: moving from Evidence to Practice. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013. p. 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF, et al. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1801–1811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar