517
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus local infiltration anesthesia in pain relief during repair of perineal trauma after vaginal delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1064-1071 | Received 24 Jul 2018, Accepted 13 Aug 2018, Published online: 05 Sep 2018

References

  • McCandlish R, Bowler U, Asten H, et al. A randomised controlled trial of care of the perineum during second stage of normal labour. BJOG. 1998;105:1262–1272.
  • Thiagamoorthy G, Johnson A, Thakar R, et al. National survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United Kingdom. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1621–1627.
  • Bick DE, Ismail KM, Macdonald S, et al. How good are we at implementing evidence to support the management of birth related perineal trauma? A UK wide survey of midwifery practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:57.
  • Sanders J, Peters TJ, Campbell R. Techniques to reduce perineal pain during spontaneous vaginal delivery and perineal suturing: a UK survey of midwifery practice. Midwifery. 2005;21:154–160.
  • Dahlen HG, Homer CSE, Cooke M, et al. Perineal outcomes and maternal comfort related to the application of perineal warm packs in the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Birth. 2007;34:282–290.
  • Dahlen HG, Homer CSE, Cooke M, et al. “Soothing the ring of fire”: Australian women’s and midwives’ experiences of using perineal warm packs in the second stage of labour. Midwifery. 2009;25:e39–e48.
  • Kargar R, Aghazadeh-Nainie A, Khoddami-Vishteh HR. Comparison of the effects of lidocaine prilocaine cream (EMLA) and lidocaine injection on reduction of perineal pain during perineum repair in normal vaginal delivery. J Fam Reprod Health Care. 2016;10:21–26.
  • Eshkevari L, Trout KK, Damore J. Management of postpartum pain. J Midwif Womens Health. 2013;58:622–631.
  • Kaweski S. Plastic surgery educational foundation technology assessment committee. Topical anesthetic creams. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:2161–2165.
  • Vickers ER, Marzbani N, Gerzina TM, et al. Pharmacokinetics of EMLA cream 5% application to oral mucosa. Anesth Prog. 1997;44:32–37.
  • Cuomo R, D’Aniello C, Grimaldi L, et al. EMLA and lidocaine spray: A comparison for surgical debridement in venous leg ulcers. Adv Wound Care. 2015;4:358–361.
  • Galosi AB, Minardi D, Dell’Atti L, et al. Tolerability of prostate transrectal biopsies using gel and local anesthetics: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol. 2005;19:738–743.
  • Lander J, Weltman B, So S. Cochrane review: EMLA and amethocaine for reduction of children’s pain associated with needle insertion. Evid-Based Child Health. 2006;1:897–925.
  • Franchi M, Cromi A, Scarperi S, et al. Comparison between lidocaine-prilocaine cream (EMLA) and mepivacaine infiltration for pain relief during perineal repair after childbirth: a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:186.e1–186.e5.
  • Friedman PM, Mafong EA, Friedman ES, et al. Topical anesthetics update: EMLA and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:1019–1026.
  • Akinturk S, Eroglu A. A clinical comparison of topical piroxicam and EMLA cream for pain relief and inflammation in laser hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:535–538.
  • Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of lidocaine–Prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1197–1201.
  • Kargı E, Tekerekoğlu B. Usage of lidocaine-prilocaine cream in the treatment of postburn pain in pediatric patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010;16:229–232.
  • Buckley MM, Benfield P. Eutectic lidocaine/Prilocaine cream. A review of the topical anaesthetic/analgesic efficacy of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetics (EMLA). Drugs. 1993;46:126–151.
  • Abbas AM, Abdellah MS, Khalaf M, et al. Effect of cervical lidocaine-prilocaine cream on pain perception during copper T380A intrauterine device insertion among parous women: A randomized double-blind controlled trial. Contraception. 2017;95:251–256.
  • Arnau B, Jovell E, Romero M, et al. Lidocaine-prilocaine cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a randomized, double blinded, controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;182:216–219.
  • Keskin AE, Onaran Y, Duvan IC, et al. Topical anesthetic (lidocaine-prilocaine) cream application before speculum examination in postmenopausal women. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012;19:350–355.
  • Zilbert A. Topical anesthesia for minor gynecological procedures: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57:171–178.
  • EMLA-FDA prescribing information, side effects and uses; [cited 2017 May 1]. Available from: https://www.drugs.com/pro/emla.html#s-34090-1.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:W–W94.
  • Green S, Higgins P, Tj AP, et al. Ch 8: assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. UK: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. p. 3–10.
  • Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560.
  • Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634.
  • Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J, et al. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med. 2003;22:2113–2126.
  • Abbas AM, Abdel Hafiz HA, Abdelhafez AM, et al. Topical lidocaine-prilocaine cream versus lidocaine infiltration for pain relief during repair of perineal tears after vaginal delivery: randomized clinical trial. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;1–6. doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1428304. (Article in press).
  • Duhan N, Nandal R, Topical lidocaine – Prilocaine cream versus lignocaine infiltration for episiotomy repair: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Res Gov. 2013;2:43–46.
  • Liberty G, Gal M, Halevy-Shalem T, et al. Lidocaine–Prilocaine (EMLA) cream as analgesia for hysterosalpingography: a prospective, randomized, controlled, double blinded study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1335–1339.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.