Uterocervical angle: an ultrasound screening tool to predict satisfactory response to labor induction

References

• Fernandez M, House M, Jambawalikar S, et al. Investigating the mechanical function of the cervix during pregnancy using finite element models derived from high-resolution 3D MRI. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng. 2016;19(4):404–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House M, McCabe R, Socrate S. Using imaging-based, three-dimensional models of the cervix and uterus for studies of cervical changes during pregnancy. Clin Anat. 2013;26(1):97–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers KM, Feltovich H, Mazza E, et al. The mechanical role of the cervix in pregnancy. J Biomech. 2015;48(9):1511–1523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannie MM, Dobrescu O, Gucciardo L, et al. Arabin cervical pessary in women at high risk of preterm birth: a magnetic resonance imaging observational follow-up study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):426–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal A, Fishwick J, Hurrell R, et al. Antenatal diagnosis of bladder/cloacal exstrophy: challenges and possible solutions. J Pediatr Urol. 2012;8(2):140–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabin B, Alfirevic Z. Cervical pessaries for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: past, present and future. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(4):390–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieroszewski P, Jasiński A, Perenc M, et al. The Arabin pessary for the treatment of threatened mid-trimester miscarriage or premature labour and miscarriage: a case series. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22(6):469–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Abdel-Aleem MA. Cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD007873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goya M, Pratcorona L, Merced C, et al. Cervical pessary in pregnant women with a short cervix (PECEP): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1800–1806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sochacki-Wójcicka N, Wojcicki J, Bomba-Opon D, et al. Anterior cervical angle as a new biophysical ultrasound marker for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(3):377–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orzechowski KM, Boelig R, Nicholas SS, et al. Is universal cervical length screening indicated in women with prior term birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(2):234.e1–234.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson K, Grobman WA, Miller ES. Is uterocervical angle associated with gestational latency after physical exam indicated cerclage? Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(9):840–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin BA, Aydogan Mathyk B, Tuten A, et al. The predictive nature of uterocervical angles in the termination of second trimester pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018:1–6. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1421936. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight JC, Tenbrink E, Onslow M, et al. Uterocervical angle measurement improves prediction of preterm birth in twin gestation. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(7):648–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzid A, Kehila M, Trabelsi H, et al. Sonographic landmarks to differentiate “false labor” and “early true labor” as a possible new application of ultrasound in labor ward. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(4):363–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch TA, Szlachetka K, Seligman NS. Ultrasonographic change in uterocervical angle is not a risk factor for preterm birth in women with a short cervix. Am J Perinatol. 2017;34(11):1058–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziadosz M, Bennett TA, Dolin C, et al. Uterocervical angle: a novel ultrasound screening tool to predict spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):376.e1–376.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Adwy AM, Sobh SM, Belal DS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;141(1):102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Bashiri A, Monteagudo A, et al. Qualified and trained sonographers in the US can perform early fetal anatomy scans between 11 and 14 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1247–1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Grobman WA, Lozitska A, et al. Adherence to criteria for transvaginal ultrasound imaging and measurement of cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(4):365.e1–365.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Simon C. Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132(2):163–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(6):1445–1454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan SS, Romero R, Haddad R, et al. The transcriptome of the uterine cervix before and after spontaneous term parturition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195(3):778–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elghorori MR, Hassan I, Dartey W, et al. Comparison between subjective and objective assessments of the cervix before induction of labour. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;26(6):521–526.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garcia-Simon R, Oros D, Gracia-Cólera D, et al. Cervix assessment for the management of labor induction: reliability of cervical length and bishop score determined by residents. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(3):377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalakis G, Thomakos N, Hatziioannou L, et al. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2006;21(1):34–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, Meis PJ, et al. The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit Network. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):567–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Pandis GK, Guirgis RR, et al. Pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length in prolonged pregnancy: the effect of parity in the prediction of induction-to-delivery interval. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(1):40–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torricelli M, Novembri R, Voltolini C, et al. Biochemical and biophysical predictors of the response to the induction of labor in nulliparous postterm pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(1):39.e1–39.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park KH, Hong JS, Kang WS, et al. Body mass index, bishop score, and sonographic measurement of the cervical length as predictors of successful labor induction in twin gestations. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(5):519–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao A, Celik E, Poggi S, et al. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32(5):646–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stupar ZT, Mikić AN, Bogavac M, et al. Prediction of labor induction outcome using different clinical parameters. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2013;141(11–12):770–774.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strobel E, Sladkevicius P, Rovas L, et al. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(3):298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, et al. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):1003–1010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keepanasseril A, Suri V, Bagga R, et al. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;47(5):389–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, et al. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24(5):538–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar