295
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The use of actograph in the assessment of fetal well-being

, , , &
Pages 2116-2121 | Received 16 Jan 2018, Accepted 22 Oct 2018, Published online: 05 Mar 2019

References

  • Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, et al. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2(8659):345–349.
  • Manning FA, Baskett TF, Morrison I, et al. Fetal biophysical profile scoring: a prospective study in 1,184 high-risk patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140(3):289–294.
  • Nijhuis JG, Prechtl HF, Martin CB Jr., et al. Are there behavioural states in the human fetus? Early Hum Dev. 1982;6(2):177–195.
  • Maeda K. Studies on new ultrasonic Doppler fetal actograph and continuous recording of fetal movement. Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn. 1984;86:280–288.
  • Besinger RE, Johnson TR. Doppler recording of fetal movement: clinical correlation with real-time ultrasound. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74(2):277–280.
  • DiPietro JA, Costigan KA, Pressman EK. Fetal movement detection: comparison of the Toitu actograph with ultrasound from 20 weeks gestation. J Matern Fetal Med. 1999;8(6):237–242.
  • Ito T, Maeda K, Takahashi H, et al. Differentiation between physiologic and pathologic sinusoidal FHR pattern by fetal actocardiogram. J Perinat Med. 1994;22(1):39–43.
  • Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E. Kean L. Liu D, Fay T. Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. Medscape Gen Med. 2000;6:53.
  • Lai J, Nowlan NC, Vaidyanathan R, et al. Fetal movements as a predictor of health. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(9):968–975.
  • Lees CC, Marlow N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis A, et al. TRUFFLE study group. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2015;30(385):2162–2172.
  • Unterscheider J, O’Donoghue K, Daly S, et al. Fetal growth restriction and the risk of perinatal mortality-case studies from the multicentre PORTO study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Feb 11;14:63.
  • Bardakci M, Balci O, Acar A, et al. Comparison of modified biophysical profile and Doppler ultrasound in predicting the perinatal outcome at or over 36 weeks of gestation. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2010;69(4):245–250.
  • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129–133.
  • Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW. Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med. 1996;24(1):25–36.
  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9(7):671–675.
  • Parra-Cordero M, Lees C, Missfelder-Lobos H, et al. Fetal arterial and venous Doppler pulsatility index and time averaged velocity ranges. Prenat Diagn. 2007 Dec;27(13):1251–1257.
  • Vasak B, Koenen SV, Koster MP, et al. Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb;45(2):162–167.
  • Van Eyck J, Wladimiroff JW, Van Den Wijngaard JAGW, et al. The blood flow velocity waveform in the fetal internal carotid and umbilical artery; its relation to fetal behavioural states in normal pregnancy at 37–38 weeks. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987;94(8):736–741.
  • Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, et al. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbilical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):124.e1–124.e6.
  • Serra V, Moulden M, Bellver J, et al. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG. 2008;115(9):1101–1107.
  • Ribbert LS, Nicolaides KH, Visser GH. Prediction of fetal acidaemia in intrauterine growth retardation: comparison of quantified fetal activity with biophysical profile score. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100(7):653–656.
  • Rabinowitz R, Persitz E, Sadovsky E. The relation between fetal heart rate accelerations and fetal movements. Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Jan;61(1):16–18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.