Medical indications for primary cesarean delivery in women with and without disabilities

References

• Arata M, Grover S, Dunne K, et al. Pregnancy outcome and complications in women with spina bifida. J Reprod Med. 2000;45:743–748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty EF, Nelson L, Krishnan E. Obstetric hospitalizations in the United States for women with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:899–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson AB, Wadley V. A multicenter study of women’s selfreported reproductive health after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1420–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skomsvoll JF, Ostensen M, Irgens LM, et al. Obstetrical and neonatal outcome in pregnant patients with rheumatic disease. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl. 1998;107:109–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winch R, Bengtson L, McLaughlin J, et al. Women with cerebral palsy: obstetric experience and neonatal outcome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;35:974–982.
   Google Scholar
• Darney BG, Biel FM, Quigley BP, et al. Primary cesarean delivery patterns among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual disabilities. Womens Health Issues. 2017;27:336–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höglund B, Lindgren P, Larsson M. Pregnancy and birth outcomes of women with intellectual disability in Sweden: a national register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:1381–1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig K. Pregnancy in multiple sclerosis. Eur Neurol. 2014;72:39–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parish SL, Mitra M, Son E, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among U.S. women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;120:433–443.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiff MA, Doody DR, Crane DA, et al. Pregnancy outcomes among deaf women in Washington State, 1987–2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:953–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, et al. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:935–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeltzer SC. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36:88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson JG, Rogers JG. Pregnancy, birth, and disability: women's health care experiences. Health Care Women Int. 2000;21:11–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Liepvre H, Dinh A, Idiard-Chamois B, et al. Pregnancy in spinal cord-injured women, a cohort study of 37 pregnancies in 25 women. Spinal Cord. 2017;55:167–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee Opinion. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Obstet Gynecol 2002;275:625–627.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson AB, Lindsey LL, Klebine PL, et al. Reproductive health for women with spinal cord injury: pregnancy and delivery. SCI Nurs. 2004;21:88–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• California Department of Heath Services. Birth Cohort Public Use File, 1999–2003. Sacramento (CA): California Department of Health Services; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Biel FM, Marshall NE, Snowden JM. Maternal body mass index and regional anaesthesia use at term: prevalence and complications. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2017;31:495–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers W. Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Tech Bull 1993;13:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Commission. National quality measures. In: Contraindications to vaginal delivery. ICD-9-CM code tables; 2013. Table 11.09.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory KD, Korst LM, Gornbein JA, et al. Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery. Health Serv Res. 2002;37:1387–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra M, Clements KM, Zhang J, et al. Maternal characteristics, pregnancy complications, and adverse birth outcomes among women with disabilities. Med Care. 2015;53:1027–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HK, Cobigo V, Lunsky Y, et al. Maternal and offspring outcomes in women with intellectual and developmental disabilities: a population-based cohort study. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2017;124:757–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell D, Mayes R, Llewellyn G. Women with intellectual disability at risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52:529–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelin AC, Sharshiner R, Caughey AB. Maternal co-morbidities and neonatal outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:4–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Zerres K. Outcome in pregnancies complicated by myotonic dystrophy: a study of 31 patients and review of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;114:44–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstein MG, Kuppermann M, Gregorich SE, et al. Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1010–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox KJ, Bovbjerg ML, Cheyney M, et al. Planned home VBAC in the United States, 2004–2009: outcomes, maternity care practices, and implications for shared decision making. Birth. 2015;42:299–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellows P, Shah U, Hawley L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30:2092–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iezzoni LI. Multiple chronic conditions and disabilities: implications for health services research and data demands. Health Serv Res. 2010;45:1523–1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine LD, Limaye M, Srinivas SK. The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor. Amer J Perinatol. 2015;32:475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korst LM, Gregory KD, Gornbein JA. Elective primary caesarean delivery: accuracy of administrative data. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2004;18:112–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber EL, Lundsberg LS, Belanger K, et al. Indications contributing to the increasing cesarean delivery rate. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner-Johnson W, Biel FM, Darney BG, et al. Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2017;10:376–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar