Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study

References

• Osterman MJ , Martin JA. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief. 2014;155:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins – Obstetrics . ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–397. Reaffirmed 2016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaknin Z , Kurzweil Y , Sherman D. Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):418–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox NS , Saltzman DH , Roman AS , et al. Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis. BJOG. 2011;118(6):647–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwiak M , Bloemenkamp KW , Kelly AJ , et al. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD001233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman DJ , Frenkel E , Tovbin J , et al. Ripening of the unfavorable cervix with extraamniotic catheter balloon. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51(10):621–627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sciscione AC , McCullough H , Manley JS , et al. A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1):55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelber S , Sciscione A. Mechanical methods of cervical ripening and labor induction. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;49(3):642–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atad J , Hallak M , Auslender R , et al. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):223–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khotaba S , Volfson M , Tarazova L , et al. Induction of labor in women with previous cesarean section using the double balloon device. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(11):1041–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atad J , Bornstein J , Kogan O , et al. Gradual cervical dilation for termination of early second-trimester pregnancy with a double balloon device. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(6):1142–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F , Huang S , Long Y , et al. Double-balloon versus single-balloon catheter for cervical ripening and labor induction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(1):27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim R , Schwartz N , Zafran N , et al. Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Perinatol. 2018;38(3):217–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atad J , Hallak M , Ben-David Y , et al. Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases. BJOG. 1997;104(1):29–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB , Sundaram V , Kaimal AJ , et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor. Evid Rep Technol Assess. (Full Rep). 2009;176:1–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe KK , Schiff MA , Peterson SE , et al. 30 mL single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):1919–1925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA , Rice MM , Reddy UM , et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann J , Gillen G , Sanchez-Ramos L , et al. Do mechanical methods of cervical ripening increase infectious morbidity? A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(2):177–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen CN , Saccone G , Backley S , et al. Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(9):1051–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshberg A , Levine LD , Srinivas S. Labor length among overweight and obese women undergoing induction of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(17):1771–1775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar