Endometrium-free uterine closure technique and abnormal placental implantation in subsequent pregnancies

References

• Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ, et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1226–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins MF, Monteith C, Foley M, et al. Real increasing incidence of hysterectomy for placenta accreta following previous caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171(1):54–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Jurkovic D. Placenta accreta: pathogenesis of a 20th century iatrogenic uterine disease. Placenta. 2012;33(4):244–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(5):1458–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(3):262.e1–262.e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Butwick AJ, et al. Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(3):384.e1–384.e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielchinsky Y, Rojansky N, Fasouliotis SJ, et al. Placenta accreta – summary of 10 years: a survey of 310 cases. Placenta. 2002;23(2–3):210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke RK, Sharpe JW, Greene RR. Placenta accreta: the adherent or invasive placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;95(5):660–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark EAS, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6):S2–S10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Publications Committee. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Belfort MA. Placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(5):430–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usta IM, Hobeika EM, Musa AA, et al. Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):1045–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntunen K, Mäkäräinen L, Kirkinen P. Outcome after a high number (4–10) of repeated caesarean sections. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;111(6):561–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shellhaas CS, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2):224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Pri-Paz S, Herzog TJ, et al. Predictors of massive blood loss in women with placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(1):38.e1–38.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrabadi A, Hutcheon JA, Liu S, et al. Contribution of placenta accreta to the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):814–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): CDC. Pregnancy mortality surveillance system; 2019 [cited Jun 4]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pregnancy-mortality-surveillance-system.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim KN, Esakoff TF, Little SE, et al. The effect of cesarean delivery rates on the future incidence of placenta previa, placenta accreta, and maternal mortality. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24(11):1341–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantbirojn P, Crum CP, Parast MM. Pathophysiology of placenta creta: the role of decidua and extravillous trophoblast. Placenta. 2008;29(7):639–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha P, Mishra M. Caesarean scar pregnancy: a precursor of placenta percreta/accreta. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(7):621–623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cali G, et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy and early placenta accreta share common histology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(4):383–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):75–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA. Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18(1):13–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RM. Implications of the first cesarean: perinatal and future reproductive health and subsequent cesareans, placentation issues, uterine rupture risk, morbidity, and mortality. Semin Perinatol. 2012;36(5):315–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):507.e1–507.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazicioglu F, Gökdogan A, Kelekci S, et al. Incomplete healing of the uterine incision after caesarean section: is it preventable? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;124(1):32–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu K, Magon N. Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique. North Am J Med Sci. 2012;4(8):358–361.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, et al. Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):65.e1–65.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CAESAR study collaborative group. Caesarean section surgical techniques: a randomised factorial trial (Caesar). BJOG. 2010;117(11):1366–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr JMM. The technique of cesarean section, with special reference to the lower uterine segment incision. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1928;1928:729–734.
   Google Scholar
• Saad AF, Rahman M, Costantine MM, et al. Blunt versus sharp uterine incision expansion during low transverse cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(6):684.e1–684.11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroz L, DiNapoli M, D’Alton M, et al. Surgical speed and risk for maternal operative morbidity in emergent repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):584.e1–584.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg D, Ahmad RS, Warsof SL, et al. A randomized clinical trial of knotless barbed suture vs conventional suture for closure of the uterine incision at cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(3):343.e1–343.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholapurkar SL. Surgical techniques at caesarean might modify placenta accreta risk. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;122(1):143–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumigama S, Sugiyama C, Kotani T, et al. Uterine sutures at prior caesarean section and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancy: a case-control study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(7):866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholapurkar SL. Increased incidence of placenta praevia and accreta with previous caesareans – a hypothesis for causation. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;33(8):806–809.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silver RM, Fox KA, Barton JR, et al. Center of excellence for placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(5):561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Erfani H, et al. Multidisciplinary team learning in the management of the morbidly adherent placenta: outcome improvements over time. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(6):612.e1–612.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Committee opinion no. 529: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):207–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brennan DJ, Schulze B, Chetty N, et al. Surgical management of abnormally invasive placenta: a retrospective cohort study demonstrating the benefits of a standardized operative approach. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015;94(12):1380–1386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauniaux E, Collins SL, Jurkovic D, et al. Accreta placentation: a systematic review of prenatal ultrasound imaging and grading of villous invasiveness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(6):712–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Bennett TA, et al. A new minimally invasive treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy and cervical pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(3):351.e1–351.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Santos R, et al. The diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of cesarean scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(1):44.e1–44.e13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang Y, Huang L. Uterine artery embolization compared with methotrexate for the management of pregnancy implanted within a cesarean scar. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201(2):152.e1–152.e3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flo K, Widnes C, Vårtun Å, et al. Blood flow to the scarred gravid uterus at 22–24 weeks of gestation. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(2):210–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temmerman M. Caesarean section surgical techniques: all equally safe. Lancet. 2016;388(10039):8–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd JM, Anderson ER, Gates S, et al. Surgical techniques for uterine incision and uterine closure at the time of caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(7):CD004732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar