335
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How prenatal head ultrasound reference ranges affect evaluation of possible fetal microcephaly

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 2529-2534 | Received 02 Apr 2019, Accepted 17 Sep 2019, Published online: 01 Oct 2019

References

  • Ten Donkelaar HJ, Lammens M, Hori A. Clinical neuroembryology. Berlin, Heidelberger: Springer; 2014.
  • Chibueze EC, Parsons AJQ, Lopes KDS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound scanning for prenatal microcephaly in the context of Zika virus infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2310.
  • Guibaud L, Lacalm A. Diagnostic imaging tools to elucidate decreased cephalic biometry and fetal microcephaly: a systematic analysis of the central nervous system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(1):16–25.
  • Leibovitz Z, Daniel-Spiegel E, Malinger G, et al. Prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(5):586–592.
  • Ioannou C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, et al. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG. 2012;119(12):1425–1439.
  • Deloison B, Chalouhi GE, Bernard JP, et al. Outcomes of fetuses with small head circumference on second-trimester ultrasonography. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32(9):869–874.
  • Kurmanavicius J, Wright EM, Royston P, et al. Fetal ultrasound biometry: 1. Head reference values. BJOG Int J O&G. 1999;106(2):126–135.
  • Stoler-Poria S, Lev D, Schweiger A, et al. Developmental outcome of isolated fetal microcephaly. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(2):154–158.
  • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. Ultrasound screening for fetal microcephaly following Zika virus exposure. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(6):B2–B4.
  • Hadlock FP, Deter RL, Harrist RB, et al. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters. Radiology. 1984;152(2):497–501.
  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(1):157–166.
  • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of obstetric ultrasound examinations. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(6):1083–1101.
  • Gelber SE, Grünebaum A, Chervenak FA. Prenatal screening for microcephaly: an update after three decades. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(2):167–170.
  • Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):869–879.
  • Chervenak FA, Jeanty P, Cantraine F, et al. The diagnosis of fetal microcephaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(5):512–517.
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) – A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
  • Griffiths PD, Mooney C, Bradburn M, et al. Should we perform in utero MRI on a fetus at increased risk of a brain abnormality if ultrasonography is normal or shows non-specific findings? Clin Radiol. 2018;73(2):123–134.
  • Sanz Cortes M, Rivera AM, Yepez M, et al. Clinical assessment and brain findings in a cohort of mothers, fetuses and infants infected with ZIKA virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):440.e1–440.e36.
  • Deter RL, Re: prediction of microcephaly at birth using three reference ranges for fetal head circumference: can we improve prenatal diagnosis? Z. Leibovitz, E. Daniel-Spiegel, G. Malinger, K. Haratz, M. Tamarkin, L. Gindes, L. Schreiber, L. Ben-Sira, D. Lev, I. Shapiro, H. Bakry, B. Weizman, A. Zreik, S. Egenburg, A. Arad, R. Tepper, D. Kidron and T. Lerman-Sagie. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(5):547–592.
  • Hendrix MLE, van Kuijk SMJ, Gavilanes AWD, et al. Reduced fetal growth velocities and the association with neonatal outcomes in appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.