Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 59 cohort studies

References

• International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology, de Mouzon J, Lancaster P, et al. World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 2002. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(9):2310–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday JL, Ukoumunne OC, Baker HW, et al. Increased risk of blastogenesis birth defects, arising in the first 4 weeks of pregnancy, after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(1):59–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, de Klerk N, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major birth defects in Western Australia. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):852–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavaniotou A, Albano C, Smitz J, et al. Impact of ovarian stimulation on corpus luteum function and embryonic implantation. J Reprod Immunol. 2002;55(1–2):123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi M, Nakai A, Satoh S, et al. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(4):922–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino JL, Moore VM, Willson KJ, et al. Perinatal outcomes by mode of assisted conception and sub-fertility in an Australian data linkage cohort. PLOS One. 2014;9(1):e80398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapiteijn K, De Bruijn CS, de Boer E, et al. Does subfertility explain the risk of poor perinatal outcome after IVF and ovarian hyperstimulation? Hum Reprod. 2006;21(12):3228–3234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DA, Donker D, et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):551–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey S, Shetty A, Hamilton M, et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(5):485–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald SD, Murphy K, Beyene J, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005;27(5):449–459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGovern PG, Llorens AJ, Skurnick JH, et al. Increased risk of preterm birth in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer or gamete intrafallopian transfer: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2004;82(6):1514–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroufizadeh S, Omani Samani R, Amini P. Relationship between assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preterm labor among singleton live-birth in Tehran Province, Iran. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2016;19(33):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects – a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):328–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimm AA, Katayama AC, Diaz M, et al. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(12):437–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1331–1337.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saylık M, Saylık SA. Not only pregnancy but also the number of fetuses in the uterus affects intraocular pressure. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(6):680–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, De Sutter P, Van der Elst J, et al. Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction – the Belgian project. Hum Reprod Update. 2005;11(1):3–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almasi-Hashiani A, Omani-Samani R, Mohammadi M, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2019;19(1):149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omani-Samani R, Alizadeh A, Almasi-Hashiani A, et al. Risk of preeclampsia following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 72 cohort studies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Page KA. Gestational diabetes mellitus: risks and management during and after pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(11):639–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(Suppl. 1):S88–S90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella T, Chodick G, Barchana M, et al. Gestational diabetes and risk of incident primary cancer: a large historical cohort study in Israel. Cancer Causes Control. 2011;22(11):1513–1520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sella T, Shalev V, Elchalal U, et al. Screening for gestational diabetes in the 21st century: a population-based cohort study in Israel. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(4):412–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anna V, Van Der Ploeg HP, Cheung NW, et al. Sociodemographic correlates of the increasing trend in prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a large population of women between 1995 and 2005. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2288–2293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady R, Alavi N, Vale R, et al. Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(2):324–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Levy Y, Lunenfeld E, Levy A. Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction compared with those conceived spontaneously. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;133(2):173–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saygan-Karamürsel B, Tekşam O, Aksu T, et al. Perinatal outcomes of spontaneous twins compared with twins conceived through intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Perinat Med. 2006;34(2):132–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics. 1994;50(4):1088–1101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma TR, Patel RH. Outcome of pregnancy following investigation and treatment of infertility. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987;25(2):113–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjercke S, Dale PO, Tanbo T, et al. Impact of insulin resistance on pregnancy complications and outcome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002;54(2):94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivurova S, Hartikainen AL, Karinen L, et al. The course of pregnancy and delivery and the use of maternal healthcare services after standard IVF in Northern Finland 1990–1995. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(11):2897–2903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson RJ, Boostanfar R, Saadat P, et al. Pregnancy in the sixth decade of life: obstetric outcomes in women of advanced reproductive age. JAMA. 2002;288(18):2320–2323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Inizi ST, Asaad M, Schick J. The outcome of in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles complicated by moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Qatar Med J. 2002;11(2):28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nassar AH, Usta IM, Rechdan JB, et al. Pregnancy outcome in spontaneous twins versus twins who were conceived through in vitro fertilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(2):513–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, et al. Maternal risks and perinatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 1005 twin pregnancies: the role of in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(1):75–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5, Part 1):1039–1045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dokras A, Baredziak L, Blaine J, et al. Obstetric outcomes after in vitro fertilization in obese and morbidly obese women. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskandar M. Outcome of twin ICSI pregnancy compared with spontaneous conceived twin pregnancy: a prospective, controlled, observational study. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2007;12(2):97–101.
   Google Scholar
• Buckett WM, Chian RC, Holzer H, et al. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):885–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieg SA, Henne MB, Westphal LM. Obstetric outcomes in donor oocyte pregnancies compared with advanced maternal age in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2008;90(1):65–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jammah AA, Somal KK, Power SG, et al. Gestational diabetes after infertility treatment for polycystic ovarian syndrome. Saudi Med J. 2009;30(4):575–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhi J, Ben-Haroush A, Sapir O, et al. High-quality embryos retain their implantation capability in overweight women. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(5):706–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasario E, Borgarello V, Bossotti C, et al. IVF twins have similar obstetric and neonatal outcome as spontaneously conceived twins: a prospective follow-up study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(3):422–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki S, Miyake H. Perinatal outcomes of elderly primiparous dichorionic twin pregnancies conceived by in vitro fertilization compared with those conceived spontaneously. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281(1):87–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bals-Pratsch M, Grosser B, Seifert B, et al. Early onset and high prevalence of gestational diabetes in PCOS and insulin resistant women before and after assisted reproduction. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011;119(06):338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaveeva P, Carbone IF, Syngelaki A, et al. Contribution of method of conception on pregnancy outcome after the 11–13 weeks scan. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2011;30(1):9–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasser S, Segev-Zahav A, Fortinsky P, et al. Primiparity at very advanced maternal age (≥45 years). Fertil Steril. 2011;95(8):2548–2551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Hourrier S, Fanchin R, et al. Is first-trimester crown-rump length associated with birthweight? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;118(10):1223–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg C, Fotopoulou C, Neissner P, et al. Maternal characteristics and twin gestation outcomes over 10 years: impact of conception methods. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):95–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber R, Fouda M, Shishtawy W, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome in triplet, quadruplet and quintuplet gestations following ART: a 11-year study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(4):759–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jie Z, Yiling D, Ling Y. Association of assisted reproductive technology with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Reprod Med. 2015;13(3):169–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(9):1203–1213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Márton V, Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, et al. Prevalences and pregnancy outcome of vanishing twin pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization versus natural conception. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1399–1406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourali L, Ayati S, Jelodar S, et al. Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancy following art compared with spontaneous pregnancy. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2016;14(5):317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Stern JE, Kotelchuck M, et al. Birth outcomes by infertility treatment: analyses of the population-based cohort: Massachusetts outcomes study of assisted reproductive technologies (MOSART). J Reprod Med. 2016;61(3–4):114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosec S, Frangez HB, Steblovnik L, et al. Independent factors influencing large-for-gestation birth weight in singletons born after in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(1):9–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Yaakov RD, Kessous R, Shoham-Vardi I, et al. Fertility treatments in women who become pregnant and carried to viability, and the risk for long-term maternal cardiovascular morbidity. Am J Perinatol. 2016;33(14):1388–1393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YA, Chughtai AA, Farquhar CM, et al. Increased incidence of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia after assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(4):920–926.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu LL, Zhang Y, Liu YF, et al. Outcome of twin ICSI pregnancy compared with spontaneous conceived twin pregnancy: a prospective, controlled, observational study. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):35141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AS, Monsour M, Kissin DM, et al. Trends in severe maternal morbidity after assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2008–2012. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(1):59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer DA, Amari F. Maternal risk factors and neonatal outcomes after ART treatment – a German monocenter experience. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2016;21(3):155–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, Crispi F, Manau D, et al. Differential effect of mode of conception and infertility treatment on fetal growth and prematurity. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(23):3879–3884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinzauti S, Ferrata C, Vannuccini S, et al. Twin pregnancies after assisted reproductive technologies: the role of maternal age on pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:198–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morency AM, Shah PS, Seaward PGR, et al. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of triplet births – spontaneous versus assisted reproductive technology conception. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(6):938–943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua S, Hng TM, Smith H, et al. Ovulatory disorders are an independent risk factor for pregnancy complications in women receiving assisted reproduction treatments. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(3):286–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashmakova NV, Davydenko NB, Malgina GB, et al. Epidemiology of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2016;32(Suppl. 2):47–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Kamath MS, Selliah HY, et al. Comparison of perinatal outcomes of vanishing twin and twin pregnancies conceived following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective analysis. Middle East Fertil Soc J. 2016;21(4):253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosato E, Perrone G, Capri O, et al. Hypertension and early menopause after the use of assisted reproductive technologies in women aged 43 years or older: long-term follow-up study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42(12):1782–1788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Gopal D, Cabral H, et al. Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(3):330.e1–330.e15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XX, Luan CX, Zhang W, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012;47(10):730–733.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern JE, Luke B, Tobias M, et al. Adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes associated with underlying diagnosis with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(6):1438–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moini A, Shiva M, Arabipoor A, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology compared with twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously: a prospective follow-up study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012;165(1):29–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingues AP, Dinis SR, Belo A, et al. Impact of induced pregnancies in the obstetrical outcome of twin pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(1):172–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberstein T, Levy A, Harlev A, et al. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies following in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(13):1316–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorescu V, Zhang Y, Kissin DM, et al. Maternal characteristics and pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology by infertility diagnosis: ovulatory dysfunction versus tubal obstruction. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(4):1019–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon LH, Gerber RS, Rebarber A, et al. Effect of oocyte donation on pregnancy outcomes in in vitro fertilization twin gestations. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1326–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caserta D, Bordi G, Stegagno M, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;174:64–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranquilli AL, Biondini V, Talebi Chahvar S, et al. Perinatal outcomes in oocyte donor pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(13):1263–1267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werder E, Mendola P, Männistö T, et al. Effect of maternal chronic disease on obstetric complications in twin pregnancies in a United States cohort. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(1):142–149.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farhi A, Reichman B, Boyko V, et al. Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;26(5):454–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Liu X, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of pregnancy-related complications and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(1):73–85.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas J, Hourvitz A, Dor J, et al. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies after early transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1344–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper NK, Farr SL, Cohen BB, et al. Singleton preterm birth: risk factors and association with assisted reproductive technology. Matern Child Health J. 2012;16(4):807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toshimitsu M, Nagamatsu T, Nagasaka T, et al. Increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and operative delivery after conception induced by in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection in women aged 40 years and older. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(4):1065–1070.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Ray C, Scherier S, Anselem O, et al. Association between oocyte donation and maternal and perinatal outcomes in women aged 43 years or older. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):896–901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrán Montoya J, Reyes Muñoz E, Cruz Rivera E, et al. Adverse perinatal outcomes in Mexican women with twin pregnancy achieved by assisted reproduction techniques vs. spontaneous twin pregnancies. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2012;80(7):445–453.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang X, Li Y, Li C, et al. Current overview of pregnancy complications and live-birth outcome of assisted reproductive technology in mainland China. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(2):385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, et al. The international committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technology (ICMART) and the world health organization (WHO) revised glossary on ART terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2683–2687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Declercq E, Luke B, Belanoff C, et al. Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART). Fertil Steril. 2015;103(4):888–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AS, Chang J, Zhang Y, et al. Perinatal outcomes among singletons after assisted reproductive technology with single-embryo or double-embryo transfer versus no assisted reproductive technology. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):954–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaight C, Gross J, Horsch A, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocr Dev. 2016;31:163–178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl. 1):S81–S90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSisto CL, Kim SY, Sharma AJ. Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (PRAMS), 2007–2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:E104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng J, Shao P, Zhang C, et al. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in Chinese pregnant women: a prospective population-based study in Tianjin, China. PLOS One. 2015;10(3):e0121029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjerulff LE, Sanchez-Ramos L, Duffy D. Pregnancy outcomes in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(6):558.e1–558.e6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi M, Gosili R, Hosseini R, et al. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;176:149–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YA, Nikravan R, Smith HC, et al. Higher prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus following assisted reproduction technology treatment. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2554–2561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, et al. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2707–2714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibai BM, Ross MG. Hypertension in gestational diabetes mellitus: pathophysiology and long-term consequences. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(3):229–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitthala S, Gelbaya TA, Brison DR, et al. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(1):45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammoud NM, de Valk HW, Biesma DH, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed by screening or symptoms: does it matter? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(1):103–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sazonova A, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, et al. Obstetric outcome in singletons after in vitro fertilization with cryopreserved/thawed embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1343–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulis KA, Goulis DG, Kolibianakis EM, et al. Risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):667–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. London: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar