Non-invasive high flow oscillatory ventilation in comparison with nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome, a literature review

References

• Fanaroff AA, Martin RJ, Walsh MC. Fanaroff and Martin’s neonatal-perinatal medicine: diseases of the fetus and infant. Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1039–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan R, Sardesai S. Lung protective ventilatory strategies in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol. 2008;28(S1):S41–S46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo WA, Martin RJ, Fanaroff AA. Assisted ventilation and complications of respiratory distress. In: Fanaroff AA, Martin RJ, editors. Neonatal-perinatal medicine diseases of the fetus and infant. 7th ed. Vol. 2. St. Louis (MO): Mosby; 2002. p. 1011–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Hempenius MA, Verhagen EA, Tanis JC, et al. Early neonatal morbidities and neurological functioning of preterm infants 2 weeks after birth. J Perinatol. 2018;38(11):1518–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2:CD000143.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmölzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, et al. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br Med J. 2013;347:f5980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome – 2016 update. Neonatology. 2017;111(2):107–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dargaville PA, Gerber A, Johansson S, et al. Incidence and outcome of CPAP failure in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2016;138(1):e20153985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1142–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor S, Roberts SA, Mitchell S, et al. Biphasic positive airway pressure or continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20154095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca D, Dell'Orto V. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in neonates: review of physiology, biology and clinical data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(6):F565–F570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagare A, Kadam S, Vaidya U, et al. Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress – a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr. 2013;59(2):113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Sinha SK, Tin W, et al. A randomized controlled trial of post-extubation bubble continuous positive airway pressure versus infant flow driver continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J Pediatr. 2009;154(5):645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cools F, Offringa M, Askie LM. Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;3:CD000104.
   Google Scholar
• Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials. Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ. 1998;316(7126):201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaizy TT, Younis UM, Bell EF, et al. Nasal high-frequency ventilation for premature infants. Acta Paediatr. 2008;97(11):1518–1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottino R, Pontiggia F, Ricci C, et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: a randomized controlled crossover trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2018;53(9):1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz D, Schneider H, Schumann S, et al. Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants: a randomised controlled cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonat Ed. 2018;103(4):F1–F5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malakian A, Bashirnezhadkhabaz S, Aramesh M, et al. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern-Fetal Neonat Med. 2018;1–151. DOI:10.1080/14767058.2018.1555810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu XW, Zhao JN, Tang SF, et al. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome: a preliminary report. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(8):1038–1042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Hoeven M, Brouwer E, Blanco CE. Nasal high frequency ventilation in neonates with moderate respiratory insufficiency. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonat Ed. 1998;79(1):F61–F63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czernik C, Schmalisch G, Bührer C, et al. Weaning of neonates from mechanical ventilation by use of nasopharyngeal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation: a preliminary study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(4):374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumas De La Roque E, Bertrand C, Tandonnet O, et al. Nasal high frequency percussive ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in transient tachypnea of the newborn: a pilot randomized controlled trial (NCT00556738). Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011;46(3):218–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerji A, Singh B, Helou SE, et al. Use of noninvasive high-frequency ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective review. Am J Perinatol. 2014;30(02):171–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CH, Shi LP, Ma XL, et al. Use of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in very low birth weight infants. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2017;55(3):177–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rüegger CM, Lorenz L, Kamlin COF, et al. The effect of noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on desaturations and bradycardia in very preterm infants: a randomized crossover trial. J Pediatr. 2018;201(273):269–273.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Z, Weiwei G, Jia C, et al. Non-invasive high frequency ventilation support in the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after extubation. Chin J Neonatol. 2017;32(2):96–99.
   Google Scholar
• Binmanee A, El Helou S, Shivananda S, et al. Use of high noninvasive respiratory support pressures in preterm neonates: a single-center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(23):2838–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukerji A, Sarmiento K, Lee B, et al. Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation versus bi-phasic continuous positive airway pressure (BP-CPAP) following CPAP failure in infants <1250 g: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2017;37(1):49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, Savović J, et al. A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10(Suppl. 1):29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, et al. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(7):726–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan J, Jones LJ, Osborn DA, et al. Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(7):CD012712.
   Google Scholar
• De Paoli AG, Morley CJ, Davis PG, et al. In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;87(1):F42–F45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca D, Carnielli VP, Conti G, et al. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs: bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36(12):2094–2100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca D, Costa R, Visconti F, et al. Oscillation transmission and volume delivery during face mask-delivered HFOV in infants: bench and in vivo study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51(7):705–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashir T, Murki S, Kiran S, et al. Nasal mask’ in comparison with ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘rotation of nasal mask with nasal prongs’ reduce the incidence of nasal injury in preterm neonates supported on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP): a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0211476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow JJ, Wilkinson MH, Neil HL, et al. In vitro performance characteristics of high-frequency oscillatory ventilators. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(6):1019–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder BA, Siler-Khodr T, Winter VT, et al. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: effects on lung function, mechanics, and airway cytokines in the immature baboon model for neonatal chronic lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162(5):1867–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar