Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population

References

• Beta J, Khan N, Khalil A, et al. Maternal and neonatal complications of fetal macrosomia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):308–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu S, An X, Fang L, et al. Risk factors and long-term health consequences of macrosomia: a prospective study in Jiangsu Province, China. J Biomed Res. 2012;26(4):235–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on practice bulletins—obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 173: fetal macrosomia. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(5):e195–e209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savona-Ventura C, Chircop M. Birth weight influence on the subsequent development of gestational diabetes mellitus. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40(2):101–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter EB, Stockburger J, Tuuli MG, et al. Large-for-gestational age and stillbirth: is there a role for antenatal testing? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(3):334–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez-Figueroa H, Truong VTT, Pedroza C, et al. Large for gestational age infants and adverse outcomes among uncomplicated pregnancies at term. Amer J Perinatol. 2017;34(7):655–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard N, Lindquist A, Hiscock R, et al. Customised growth charts in large-for-gestational-age infants and the association with emergency caesarean section rate. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(3):380–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjaarda LA, Albert PS, Mumford SL, et al. Customized large-for-gestational-age birthweight at term and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(1):63.e1–63.e11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua XG, Jiang W, Hu R, et al. Large for gestational age and macrosomia in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;0(0):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fetal growth restriction ACOG practice bulletin [Internet]. Washington (DC): ACOG. 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 9]. Available from: https://zeze.sci-hub.cc/05032141dbd0567afa215a5603c54611/[email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wang XF, Wang Y, et al. The incidence rate, high-risk factors, and short- and long-term adverse outcomes of fetal growth restriction: A report from mainland China. Med (Baltimore). 2014;93(27):e210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usher R, McLean F. Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr. 1969;74(6):901–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carberry AE, Gordon A, Bond DM, et al. Customised versus population-based growth charts as a screening tool for detecting small for gestational age infants in low-risk pregnant women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehbe MA, Charafeddine L, Yunis KA. Intrauterine growth standards In: Preedy VR, editor. Handbook of growth and growth monitoring in health and disease. New York (NY): Springer; 2012. p. 93–114.
   Google Scholar
• Gardosi J. Customised assessment of fetal growth potential: implications for perinatal care. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(5):F314–F317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Definition of STANDARD [Internet]. [cited 2019 Apr 19]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/standard.
   Google Scholar
• Kiserud T, Piaggio G, Carroli G, et al. The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight. PLoS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garza C. The INTERGROWTH-21st Project and the Multicenter Growth Reference Study: enhanced opportunities for monitoring growth from early pregnancy to 5 years of age. Med. 2014;9(7):341–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13(1):59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yudkin PL, Aboualfa M, Eyre JA, et al. New birthweight and head circumference centiles for gestational ages 24 to 42 weeks. Early Hum Dev. 1987;15(1):45–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, et al. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1855–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Martinez-Poyer J. In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard. Radiology. 1991;181(1):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Chang A, Kalyan B, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet. 1992;339(8788):283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquia ML, Berger H, Ray JG, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes among infants of immigrant women according to birth-weight curves tailored to maternal world region of origin. CMAJ. 2015;187(1):E32–E40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubiel M, Krajewski M, Pietryga M, et al. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population. Ginekol Pol. 2008;79(11):746–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee opinion no 611: method for estimating due date. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):863–866.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape (with discussion). J Royal Statistical Soc C. 2005;54(3):507–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole TJ. Using the LMS method to measure skewness in the NCHS and Dutch National height standards. Ann Hum Biol. 1989;16(5):407–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole TJ, Green PJ. Smoothing reference centile curves: the LMS method and penalized likelihood. Statist Med. 1992;11(10):1305–1319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilers PHC, Marx BD. Flexible smoothing with B -splines and penalties. Statist Sci. 1996;11(2):89–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence-based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S855–S868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekiesińska-Figatowska M, Borszewska-Kornacka MK, Neonatologiczne PT. Wspólnicy MPPA i. Standardy opieki medycznej nad noworodkiem w Polsce: zalecenia Polskiego Towarzystwa Neonatologicznego. Polskie towarzystwa Neonatologiczne; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa-Santos RF, Miguelote RF, Cruz-Correia RJ, et al. Development of a birthweight standard and comparison with currently used standards. What is a 10th centile? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:184–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, et al. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar