Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study

References

• Hickok DE, Gordon DC, Milberg JA, et al. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):851–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffinet F, Carayol M, Foidart JM, et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(4):1002–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluver C, Gyte GM, Sinclair M, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2(2):CD000184.
   Google Scholar
• Cluver C, Gyte GM, Sinclair M, et al. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD000184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danielian PJ, Wang J, Hall MH. Long-term outcome by method of delivery of fetuses in breech presentation at term: population based follow up. BMJ. 1996;312(7044):1451–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. External cephalic version facilitation for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2:CD000184.
   Google Scholar
• Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, et al. Systematic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20(2):163–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson DC, Ferguson JE, Hensleigh P. Antepartum external cephalic version under tocolysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;67(1):63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4(4):CD000083.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Barrett J. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2002;24(10):804–810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, et al. External cephalic version at term: a 6-year single-operator experience. Birth. 2019;1–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12429
   Google Scholar
• Melo P, Georgiou EX, Hedditch A, et al. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years’ experience. BJOG. 2019;126(4):493–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Simioni JC, Thabane L. Predictors of success of external cephalic version and cephalic presentation at birth among 1253 women with non-cephalic presentation using logistic regression and classification tree analyses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):1012–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 161: external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127(2):e54–e61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, et al. Late preterm versus term external cephalic version: an audit of a single obstetrician experience. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(4):875–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, et al. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;230:178–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalifoux LA, Bauchat JR, Higgins N, et al. Effect of intrathecal bupivacaine dose on the success of external cephalic version for breech presentation: a prospective, randomized, blinded clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2017;127(4):625–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boujenah J, Fleury C, Bonneau C, et al. Successful external cephalic version is an independent factor for caesarean section during trial of labor—a matched controlled study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(10):737–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2:CD000184.
   Google Scholar
• Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z, et al. Employing nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(4):434–437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaris R, Tan PC. Oral nifepidine versus subcutaneous terbutaline tocolysis for external cephalic version: a double-blind randomised trial. BJOG. 2009;116(1):74–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed Ismail NA, Ibrahim M, Mohd Naim N, et al. Nifedipine versus terbutaline for tocolysis in external cephalic version. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2008;102(3):263–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonik B, Benedetti T, Creasy RK, et al. Intramuscular versus intravenous ritodrine hydrochloride for preterm labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(2):323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabiri D, Elram T, Aboo-Dia M, et al. Timing of delivery after external cephalic version and the risk for cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(2, Part 1):209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok M, Bais JM, van Lith JM, et al. Nifedipine as a uterine relaxant for external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(2, Part 1):271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King JF. Tocolysis and preterm labour. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2004;16(6):459–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman A, Anderson K-E, Person CGA, et al. Relaxant effects of nifedipine on isolated, human myometrium. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 2009;45(2):81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Leathersich SJ, Vogel JP, Tran TS, et al. Acute tocolysis for uterine tachysystole or suspected fetal distress. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD009770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, et al. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1143–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar