Interventions to reduce the cesarean delivery rate in a tertiary hospital in China

References

• Victora CG, Barros FC. Beware: unnecessary caesarean sections may be hazardous. Lancet. 2006;367(9525):1796–1797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, et al. Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2005;7628 2007.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Monitoring emergency obstetric care: a handbook. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, et al. World Health Organization Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010;9713:490–499.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010–2011. Pediatrics. 2013;131(3):548–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;8452:436–437.
   Google Scholar
• Maternal, infant and child health. Healthy people 2020 summary of objectives. Available from: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/maternal-infant-and-child-health.
   Google Scholar
• Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(2):297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463–1464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in Southeast China. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(5):1077–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu YB, Li HT, Zhang YL, et al. Secular trends of cesarean delivery and cesarean delivery on maternal request among primiparous women with singleton pregnancy in Southern and Northern China during 1993-2010. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012;92(25):1734–1737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang CP, Tan WC, Kanagalingam D, et al. Why we do caesars: a comparison of the trends in caesarean section delivery over a decade. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2013;42(8):408–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Li G, Chen Y, et al. A descriptive analysis of the indications for caesarean section in mainland China. BMC Preg Childbirth. 2014;14(1):410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao Y, Xue Q, Chen G, et al. An analysis of the indications for cesarean section in a teaching hospital in China. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(2):414–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee LYK, Holroyd E, Ng CY. Exploring factors influencing Chinese women’s decision to have elective caesarean surgery. Midwifery. 2001;17(4):314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang E. Requests for cesarean deliveries: the politics of labor pain and pain relief in Shanghai, China. Soc Sci Med. 2017;173:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, et al. Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gy. 2016;123(5):745–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam M. Cesarean delivery on request: reproductive consequences. Semin Perinatol. 2006;30(5):257–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JP, Gülmezoglu A, Lumbiganon P, et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse short-term maternal outcomes: the 2004–2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Med. 2010;8(1):71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretative review of the English language literature, 1860-1980. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983;38(6):322–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macarthur AJ, Macarthur C. Incidence, severity, and determinants of perineal pain after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(4):1199–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Episiotomy. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Number 71, April 2006. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(4):957–962.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6(6):567–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1956;8(6):691–703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal JL, Cummins S, Gasparrini A. Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46(1):348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal S, Blatman R, Doble M, et al. The influence of the obstetrician in the relationship between epidural analgesia and cesarean section for dystocia. Anesthesiology. 1999;91(1):90–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CA, Scavone BM, Peaceman AM, et al. The risk of cesarean delivery with neuraxial analgesia given early versus late in labor. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):655–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Y, Zhang X, Sun C, et al. Reducing the rate of cesarean delivery on maternal request through institutional and policy interventions in Wenzhou, China. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0186304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung BK. Continuous epidural analgesia for painless labor does not increase the incidence of cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2000;38(2):79–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan ZT, Gao XL, Yang HX. Popularizing labor analgesia in China. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;98(3):205–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LQ, Flood P, Li Y, et al. No pain labor & delivery: A global health initiative’s impact on clinical outcomes in China. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(6):1931–1938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L-Q, Zhang J, Wong CA, et al. Impact of the introduction of neuraxial labor analgesia on mode of delivery at an urban maternity hospital in China. Obstet Anesth Dig. 2016;36(1):47.
   Google Scholar
• Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 1999;1:CD000081.
   Google Scholar
• Shahraki AD, Aram S, Pourkabirian S, et al. A comparison between early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparous vaginal delivery. J Res Med Sci. 2011;16(12):1583–1589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Guo P, Kong X, et al. Restrictive use of episiotomy during spontaneous vaginal delivery. Med J Chin PAPF. 2012;6:468–470.
   Google Scholar
• Frankman EA, Wang L, Bunker CH, et al. Episiotomy in the United States: has anything changed? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):573.e1–573.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson-Leedy JG, DiSilvestro AJ, Repke JT, et al. Reduction in the cesarean delivery rate after obstetric care consensus guideline implementation. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen WR, Friedman EA. Misguided guidelines for managing labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):753.e1–753.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leveno KJ, Nelson DB, McIntire DD. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):484–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runmei M, Terence T L, Yonghu S, et al. Practice audits to reduce caesareans in a tertiary referral hospital in south-western China. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(7):488–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijagal MA, Kuppermann M, Nakagawa S, et al. Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(4):491.e1–491.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betrán AP, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, et al. Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018;392(10155):1358–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstein MG, Nijagal M, Nakagawa S, et al. The association of expanded access to a collaborative midwifery and laborist model with cesarean delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(4):716–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel de Bocanegra H, Chang R, Howell M, et al. Interpregnancy intervals: impact of postpartum contraceptive effectiveness and coverage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(4):311.e1–311.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar