https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-7418
References
- Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148343.
- Landon MB, Grobman WA, Kennedy E. Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. What we have learned about trial of labor after cesarean delivery from the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Cesarean Registry. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(5):281–286.
- Khunpradit S, Tavender E, Lumbiganon P, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;6(6):CD005528.
- Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, et al. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists workshop. In reply. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):687.
- Bellows P, Shah U, Hawley L, et al. Evaluation of outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean delivery after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(17):2092–2096.
- Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589.
- Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, et al. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;12:CD004224.
- Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
- Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY, et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(3):1016–1023.
- Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimouni FB, et al. Birth weight standards in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;7(5):311–314.
- Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, et al. How do good candidates for trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) who undergo elective repeat cesarean differ from those who choose TOLAC? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):458.e1–458.e6.
- Bonzon M, Gross MM, Karch A, et al. Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section – an online survey investigating women’s preferences in Western Switzerland. Midwifery. 2017;50:219–227.
- Mone F, Harrity C, Toner B, et al. Predicting why women have elective repeat cesarean deliveries and predictors of successful vaginal birth after cesarean. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;126(1):67–69.
- Eden KB, Hashima JN, Osterweil P, et al. Childbirth preferences after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth. 2004;31(1):49–60.
- Black M, Entwistle VA, Bhattacharya S, et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women’s accounts of their birth choices. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e008881.
- Lehmann S, Baghestan E, Børdahl PE, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean section in risk pregnancies: a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(7):894–904.
- Ganer Herman H, Kogan Z, Bar J, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery for pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):84–88.
- Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Stevens EJ, et al. Safety and success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in patients with preeclampsia. Am J Perinatol. 2006;23(3):145–152.