545
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Reducing post-extubation failure rates in very preterm infants: is BiPAP better than CPAP?

, , , , , & show all
Pages 1272-1277 | Received 21 Dec 2019, Accepted 24 Mar 2020, Published online: 07 Apr 2020

References

  • Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2019 update. Neonatology. 2019;115(4):432–450.
  • Horbar JD, Carpenter JH, Badger GJ, et al. Mortality and neonatal morbidity among infants 501 to 1500 grams from 2000 to 2009. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):1019–1026.
  • Jensen EA, Dysart K, Gantz MG, et al. The diagnosis of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm infants. An evidence-based approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200(6):751–759.
  • Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):171–174.
  • Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure. Failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology. 2013;104(1):8–14.
  • Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, et al. H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2:CD003212.
  • O’Brien K, Campbell C, Brown L, et al. Infant flow biphasic nasal continuous positive airway pressure (BP- NCPAP) vs. infant flow NCPAP for the facilitation of extubation in infants’ ≤ 1,250 grams: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12(1):43.
  • Victor S, Roberts SA, Mitchell S, et al. Biphasic positive airway pressure or continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20154095.
  • Buzzella B, Claure N, D’Ugard C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels after extubation in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2014;164(1):46–51.
  • Abman HS, Collaco JM, Shepherd EG, et al. Interdisciplinary care of children with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J Pediatr. 2017;181:12–28.
  • Miedema M, van der Burg PS, Beuger S, et al. Effect of nasal continuous and biphasic positive airway pressure on lung volume in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2013;162(4):691–697.
  • Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH, Keszler M, et al. Assisted ventilation of the neonate, Sixth Edition. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier; 2017.
  • Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(2):F85–F89.
  • Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E, et al. Noninvasive ventilation strategies for early treatment of RDS in preterm infants: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(3):444–451.
  • Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E, et al. Comparison of three non-invasive ventilation strategies (NSIPPV/BiPAP/NCPAP) for RDS in VLBW infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(21):2832–2838.
  • Ancora G, Maranella E, Grandi S, et al. Role of bilevel positive airway pressure in the management of preterm newborns who have received surfactant. Acta Paediatrica. 2010;99(12):1807–1811.
  • Abramo T, Williams A, Mushtaq S, et al. Paediatric ED BiPAP continuous quality improvement programme with patient analysis: 2005-2013. BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e011845.
  • Lampland AL, Plumm B, Worwa C, et al. Bi-level CPAP does not improve gas exchange when compared with conventional CPAP for the treatment of neonates recovering from respiratory distress syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F31–F34.
  • Greenberg RG, Kandefer S, Do BT, et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Late-onset sepsis in extremely premature infants: 2000-2011. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2017;36(8):774–779.
  • Manilal-Reddy PI, Al-Jumaily AM. Understanding the use of continuous oscillating positive airway pressure (bubble CPAP) to treat neonatal respiratory disease: an engineering approach. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33(3):214–222.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.