Sources of heterogeneity when studying the cardiovascular effects of fetal growth restriction: an overview of the issues

References

• Al Lwan A, Armstrong T, Bettcher D, et al. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases; 2010.[Online]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s18629en/s18629en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barker D. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. Br Med J. 1990;301(6761):1111–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker D. In utero programming of chronic disease. Clin Sci. 1998;95(2):115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker D. The developmental origins of adult disease. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(sup6):588S–595S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvari SI, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Nuñez-Garcia M, et al. Persistence of cardiac remodeling in preadolescents with fetal growth restriction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(1):e005270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispi F, Bijnens B, Figueras F, et al. Fetal growth restriction results in remodeled and less efficient hearts in children. Circulation. 2010;121(22):2427–2436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker DJ, Winter PD, Osmond C, et al. Weight in infancy and death from ischaemic heart disease. Lancet. 1989;334(8663):577–580.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Lopez M, Osorio L, Acosta-Rojas R, et al. Influence of breastfeeding and postnatal nutrition on cardiovascular remodeling induced by fetal growth restriction. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(1):100–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veille JC, Hanson R, Sivakoff M, et al. Fetal cardiac size in normal, intrauterine growth retarded, and diabetic pregnancies. Amer J Perinatol. 1993;10(04):275–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyague NI, Ghidini A. Effect of fetal growth restriction on ultrasonographically measured cardiac size. Early Hum Dev. 1997;48(1–2):93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cinar B, Sert A, Gokmen Z, et al. Left ventricular dimensions, systolic functions, and mass in term neonates with symmetric and asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction. Cardiol Young. 2015;25(2):301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnegård N, Morsing E, Cinthio M, et al. Cardiovascular function in adulthood following intrauterine growth restriction with abnormal fetal blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnott C, Skilton MR, Ruohonen S, et al. Subtle increases in heart size persist into adulthood in growth restricted babies: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Open Hear. 2015;2(1):e000265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond D, Currie J. Killing me softly: the fetal origins hypothesis. J Econ Perspect. 2011;25(3):153–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneth N, Susser M. Early origin of coronary heart disease (the “Barker hypothesis”). BMJ. 1995;310(6977):411–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kimm SY. Fetal origins of adult disease: the Barker hypothesis revisited-2004. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2004;11(4):192–196.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Whatley C, Wong FY, et al. Effects of foetal growth restriction and preterm birth on cardiac morphology and function during infancy. Acta Paediatr. 2018;107(3):450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crispi F, Miranda J, Gratacós E. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of fetal growth restriction: biology, clinical implications, and opportunities for prevention of adult disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S869–S879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schisterman EF, Cole SR, Platt RW. Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology. 2009;20(4):488–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):86–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2016;10:CMPed.S40070.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen E, Wong FY, Horne RSC, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction: impact on cardiovascular development and function throughout infancy. Pediatr Res. 2016;79(6):821–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J. Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, et al. An adjustable fetal weight standard. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(3):168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiossi G, Pedroza C, Costantine MM, et al. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):156–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GCS, et al. Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLOS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ, et al. The INTERGROWTH-21 st fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S630–S640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-López M, Cruz-Lemini M, Valenzuela-Alcaraz B, et al. Descriptive analysis of different phenotypes of cardiac remodeling in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(2):207–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt RIG, Byrne CD. Intrauterine growth, the vascular system, and the metabolic syndrome. Semin Vasc Med. 2002;2(1):033–044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leeson P, Lewandowski AJ. A new risk factor for early heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(21):2643–2645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiallourou SR, Wallace EM, Whatley C, et al. Sleep: a window into autonomic control in children born preterm and growth restricted. Sleep. 2017;40(5):zsx048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzeng C-R, Chang YI, Chang Y, et al. Cluster analysis of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors in women of reproductive age. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1404–1410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiología intermedia - Conceptos y Aplicaciones - Szklo & Nieto. Available from: https://es.scribd.com/doc/37234366/Epidemiologia-intermedia-Conceptos-y-Aplicaciones-Szklo-amp-Nieto.
   Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ. On the distinction between interaction and effect modification. Epidemiology. 2009;20(6):863–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SR, Platt RW, Schisterman EF, et al. Illustrating bias due to conditioning on a collider. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(2):417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luque-Fernandez MA, Zoega H, Valdimarsdottir U, et al. Deconstructing the smoking-preeclampsia paradox through a counterfactual framework. Eur J Epidemiol. 2016;31(6):613–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrier I, Platt RW. Reducing bias through directed acyclic graphs. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:70.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fouzas S, Karatza AA, Davlouros PA, et al. Neonatal cardiac dysfunction in intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr Res. 2014;75(5):651–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderWeele TJ. A Three-way decomposition of a total effect into direct, indirect, and interactive effects. Epidemiology. 2013;24(2):224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar