The impact of chorionicity and assisted reproductive therapies in obstetric and neonatal outcomes

References

• Boyle B, McConkey R, Garne E, et al. Trends in the prevalence, risk and pregnancy outcome of multiple births with congenital anomaly: a registry-based study in 14 European countries 1984–2007. BJOG. 2013;120(6):707–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arıoğlu Aydın Ç, Aydın S, Serdaroğlu H. Multifetal gestations with assisted reproductive technique before the single-embryo transfer legislation: obstetric, neonatal outcomes and congenital anomalies. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(15):2475–2480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado M, Lima Teixeira E, Ferreira LM, et al. Impacto da Corionicidade nas Complicações Perinatais da Gestação Gemelar. Acta Med Port. 2017;30(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, et al. Twins: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):305–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi Setti PE, Moioli M, Smeraldi A, et al. Obstetric outcome and incidence of congenital anomalies in 2351 IVF/ICSI babies. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(6):711–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrington KJ, Janvier A. The paediatric consequences of assisted reproductive technologies, with special emphasis on multiple pregnancies. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(4):340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperling L, Kiil C, Larsen LU, et al. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital abnormalities and transfusion syndrome in twins. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;29(5):517–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X-H, Qiu L-Q, Huang J-P. Risk of birth defects increased in multiple births. Birth Defects Res Part A. 2011;91(1):34–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Su R-N, Zhu W-W, Wei Y-M, et al. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in multiple pregnancy: a multicentre study in the Beijing population. Chronic Dis Translat Med. 2015;1(4):197–202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Lourdes Brizot M, Fujita MM, dos Reis NSV, et al. Malformações Fetais em Gestação Múltipla. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2000;22(8):511–517.
   Google Scholar
• Joó JG, Csatlós É, Börzsönyi B, et al. Non-syndromic malformations of the central nervous system in twin pregnancies: diagnostic and other clinical features of importance. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;154(1):27–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glinianaia SV, Rankin J, Wright C. Congenital anomalies in twins: a register-based study. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(6):1306–1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oepkes D, Sueters M. Antenatal fetal surveillance in multiple pregnancies. Best Practice Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;38:59–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unal ER. Fetal surveillance and timing of delivery for multiples. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(3):676–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Hodges R, Knight M, et al. Optimal interval between ultrasound scans for the detection of complications in monochorionic twins. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017;41(3):197–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter C, Kupka MS, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2013: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(10):1957–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kissin DM, Kulkarni AD, Kushnir VA, et al . Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadini R, Mignini Renzini M, Guarnieri T, et al. Comparison of the obstetric and perinatal outcomes of children conceived from in vitro or in vivo matured oocytes in in vitro maturation treatments with births from conventional ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(12):3601–3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedder J, Loft A, Parner ET, et al. Neonatal outcome and congenital malformations in children born after ICSI with testicular or epididymal sperm: a controlled national cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):230–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N, Biron-Shental T, Sukenik-Halevy R, et al. Oocyte activation by calcium ionophore and congenital birth defects: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):590–596.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauser B, Devroey P, Diedrich K, et al. Health outcomes of children born after IVF/ICSI: a review of current expert opinion and literature. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;28(2):162–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsello G, Piro E. The world of twins: an update. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23(sup3):59–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okun N, Sierra S, Douglas Wilson R, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2014;36(1):64–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(10):731–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin JB, Wang H, Sheng X, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1180–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Milne E, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and birth defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(4):330–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien YM, Ryan M, Martyn F, et al. A retrospective study of the effect of increasing age on success rates of assisted reproductive technology. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2017;138(1):42–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reefhuis J, Honein MA, Schieve LA, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(2):360–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulou O, Fouzas S, Sinopidis X, et al. Congenital heart disease in twins: the contribution of type of conception and chorionicity. Int J Cardiol. 2016;218:144–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Sheng X, Wang H, et al. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of congenital malformations: a meta-analysis based on cohort studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(4):777–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgione V, Parazzini F, Fesslova V, et al. Congenital heart defects in IVF/ICSI pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tararbit K, Lelong N, Thieulin A-C, et al. The risk for four specific congenital heart defects associated with assisted reproductive techniques: a population-based evaluation. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutarra-Vilchez R, Santamariña-Rubio E, Salvador J, et al. Birth defects in medically assisted reproduction pregnancies in the city of Barcelona: birth defects in medically assisted reproduction. Prenat Diagn. 2014;34(4):327–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belva F, Henriet S, Van den Abbeel E, et al. Neonatal outcome of 937 children born after transfer of cryopreserved embryos obtained by ICSI and IVF and comparison with outcome data of fresh ICSI and IVF cycles. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(10):2227–2238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daliri S, Safarpour H, Bazyar J, et al. The relationship between some neonatal and maternal factors during pregnancy with the prevalence of congenital malformations in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(21):3666–3674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen J, Jiang J, Ding C, et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1331–1337.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahin L, Bozkurt M, Şahin H, et al. To compare aneuploidy rates between ICSI and IVF Cases. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20(6):652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catford SR, McLachlan RI, O'Bryan MK, et al. Long-term follow-up of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived offspring compared with in vitro fertilization-conceived offspring: a systematic review of health outcomes beyond the neonatal period. Andrology. 2017;5(4):610–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, et al. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet. 2002;359(9305):461–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Schmidt L, et al. Neurological late sequelae in twins born after in vitro fertilisation–secondary publication. A national cohort study. Ugeskr Laeg. 2005;167(33):3051–3054.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar