Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening

References

• Australia's mothers and babies 2018 – in brief. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keulen JK, Bruinsma A, Kortekaas JC, et al. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed). 2019;364:l344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic L, Pettitt DJ. Gestational diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(20):2516–2518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barda G, Ganer Herman H, Sagiv R, et al. Foley catheter versus intravaginal prostaglandins E2 for cervical ripening in women at term with an unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(20):2777–2781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennell CE, Henderson JJ, O’Neill MJ, et al. Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel. BJOG. 2009;116(11):1443–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2095–2103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Ten Eikelder ML, et al. Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170(1):137–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):917–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dencker A, Berg M, Bergqvist L, et al. Identification of latent phase factors associated with active labor duration in low-risk nulliparous women with spontaneous contractions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(8):1034–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowswell T, Kelly AJ, Livio S, et al. Different methods for the induction of labour in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev. 2010;2010(8):CD007701.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly AJ, Alfirevic Z, Ghosh A. Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(11):CD007372.
   Google Scholar
• PonMalar J, Benjamin SJ, Abraham A, et al. Randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of preinduction cervical priming with 25 microg of misoprostol in the outpatient setting to prevent formal induction of labour. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):33–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaffaney CA, Saul LL, Rumney PJ, et al. Outpatient oral misoprostol for prolonged pregnancies: a pilot investigation. Amer J Perinatol. 2009;26(09):673–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang DW, Velazquez MD, Colyer M, et al. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening at term: comparison of outpatient vs. inpatient administration. J Reprod Med. 2005;50(10):735–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna DS, Ester JB, Proffitt M, et al. Misoprostol outpatient cervical ripening without subsequent induction of labor: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104(3):579–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stitely ML, Browning J, Fowler M, et al. Outpatient cervical ripening with intravaginal misoprostol. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):684–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnfield L, Neale E, Reynolds S. Outpatient cervical ripening in a district general hospital: a five-year retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):301–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biem SR, Turnell RW, Olatunbosun O, et al. A randomized controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled-release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2003;25(1):23–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayburn W, Gosen R, Ramadei C Jr., et al. Outpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel in uncomplicated postdate pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158(6 Pt 1):1417–1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016;123(3):346–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Fairclough A, Kavanagh J, et al. Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(6):CD003101.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, et al. A randomised controlled trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 (OPRA study). BJOG. 2015;122(1):94–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JP, Osoti AO, Kelly AJ, et al. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017(9):CD007701.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal K, Batra A, Batra A, et al. Evaluation of isosorbide mononitrate for cervical ripening prior to induction of labor for postdated pregnancy in an outpatient setting. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;118(3):205–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib SM, Emam SS, Saber AS. Outpatient cervical ripening with nitric oxide donor isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;101(1):57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Fuchs F, Closset E, et al. Outpatient cervical ripening by nitric oxide donors for prolonged pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(6):1089–1097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollapragada SS, MacKenzie F, Norrie JD, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate (IMN) prior to induction of labour-clinical trial with analyses of efficacy and acceptability. The IMOP study. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1185–1195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddama O, Petrou S, Schroeder L, Bollapragada SS, et al. The cost-effectiveness of outpatient (at home) cervical ripening with isosorbide mononitrate prior to induction of labour. BJOG. 2009;116(9):1196–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster K, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Evaluation of a transcervical Foley catheter as a source of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):539–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciscione AC, Bedder CL, Hoffman MK, et al. The timing of adverse events with Foley catheter preinduction cervical ripening; implications for outpatient use. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(9):781–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, et al. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. BJOG. 2018;125(9):1086–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruit H, Heikinheimo O, Ulander VM, et al. Foley catheter induction of labor as an outpatient procedure. J Perinatol. 2016;36(8):618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciscione AC, Muench M, Pollock M, et al. Transcervical Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(5 Pt 1):751–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann M, Gibbons K, Flenady V, et al. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 as an inpatient versus balloon catheter as an outpatient: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2020;127(5):571–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A comparison of inpatient with outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna DS, Duke JM. Effectiveness and infectious morbidity of outpatient cervical ripening with a Foley catheter. J Reprod Med. 2004;49(1):28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Policiano C, Pimenta M, Martins D, et al. Outpatient versus inpatient cervix priming with Foley catheter: a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;210:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuper SG, Jauk VC, George DM, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter for induction of labor in parous women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(1):94–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry A, Madan A, Reid R, et al. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin K, Chambers GM, de Abreu Lourenco R, et al. Cost-effectiveness of term induction of labour using inpatient prostaglandin gel versus outpatient Foley catheter. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(5):440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton C, Harding J, Griffin C. Patient attitudes towards outpatient cervical ripening prior to induction of labour at an Australian tertiary hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;36(7):921–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard K, Gerard K, Adelson P, et al. Women's preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, et al. Psychosocial outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of outpatient cervical priming for induction of labor. Birth. 2013;40(2):75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oster C, Adelson PL, Wilkinson C, et al. Inpatient versus outpatient cervical priming for induction of labour: therapeutic landscapes and women's preferences. Health Place. 2011;17(1):379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull D, Adelson P, Oster C, et al. The impact of outpatient priming for induction of labour on midwives' work demand, work autonomy and satisfaction. Women Birth. 2013;26(3):207–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp AN, Stock SJ, Alfirevic Z. Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:21–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amorosa JM, Stone JL. Outpatient cervical ripening. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(6):488–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rath WH. Outpatient induction – how safe. J Perinat Med. 2009;37(5):461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold B, Sciscione A. Is there a place for outpatient preinduction cervical ripening? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(4):583–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar