Earlier and improved screening for impending fetal compromise

References

• Campanile M, D'Alessandro P, Della Corte L, et al. Intrapartum cardiotocography with and without computer analysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(13):2284–2290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwal E, Shinar S, Aviram A, et al. A novel modality for intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(6):889–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saling E. Comments on past and present situation of intensive monitoring of the fetus during labor. J Perinat Med. 1996;24(1):7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahir Mahmood U, O’Gorman C, Marchocki Z, et al. Fetal scalp stimulation (FSS) versus fetal blood sampling (FBS) for women with abnormal fetal heart rate monitoring in labor: a prospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(13):1742–1747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandraharan E, Wiberg N. Fetal scalp blood sampling during labor: an appraisal of the physiological basis and scientific evidence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014;93(6):544–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins RP. Perinatal observations in a high-risk population managed without intrapartum fetal pH studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149(3):327–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG. Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: defining the pathogenesis and pathophysiology. Washington (DC): ACOG; 2003. p. 94.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG. Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome. In: D’Alton M, editor. Washington (DC): ACOG; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, et al. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2008;37(5):510–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Hamilton EF, Garite TJ, et al. The limits of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in the prevention of neonatal metabolic acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216:163 e1–e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galen R, Gambino R. Beyond normality. New Jersey: Wiley Biomedical Publishing Co.; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Gastel B, Harddow JE, Fletcher JC, et al. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein: issues in the prenatal screening of neural tube defects. Washington (DC): US Gov't Printing Office; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Evans MI, Eden RD, Britt DW, et al. Re-engineering the interpretation of electronic fetal monitoring to identify reversible risk for cerebral palsy: a case control series. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(15):2561–2569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans M, Eden R, Britt D, et al. Reconceptualizing fetal monitoring. Eur J Gyn Obstet. 2019;1:10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hagberg H, Mallard C, Ferriero DM, et al. The role of inflammation in perinatal brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(4):192–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey MC, Maclennan AH, Kretzschmar D, et al. The genetic basis of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(5):462–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogunyemi D, Jovanovski A, Friedman P, et al. Temporal and quantitative associations of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring patterns and neonatal outcomes (dagger). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(18):3115–3124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JM, Mitchell MD, Kumar SS. The physiology of intrapartum fetal compromise at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(1):17–26. 222;
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray DM, O'Riordan MN, Horgan R, et al. Fetal heart rate patterns in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: relationship with early cerebral activity and neurodevelopmental outcome. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26(8):605–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer PJ. Continuous electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labour is a screening test, not a diagnostic test. BJOG. 2018;125(11):1488–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon EH, Quilligan EJ. Electronic evaluation of fetal heart rate. IX. Further observations on “pathologic” fetal bradycardia. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1968;11(1):145–167.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Khazin AF, Hon EH, Quilligan EJ. Biochemical studies of the fetus. 3. Fetal base and Apgar scores. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;34(4):592–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt DW, Evans MI, Schifrin BS, et al. Refining the prediction and prevention of emergency operative deliveries with the Fetal Reserve Index. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;46(3):159–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden RD, Evans MI, Britt DW, et al. Combined prenatal and postnatal prediction of early neonatal compromise risk. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2019.1676714
   Google Scholar
• Eden RD, Evans MI, Britt DW, et al. Safely lowering the emergency cesarean and operative vaginal delivery rates using the Fetal Reserve Index. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(9):1473–1479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden RD, Evans MI, Evans SM, et al. Reengineering electronic fetal monitoring interpretation: using the Fetal Reserve Index to anticipate the need for emergent operative delivery. Reprod Sci. 2018;25(4):487–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden RD, Evans MI, Evans SM, et al. The “Fetal Reserve Index”: re-engineering the interpretation and responses to fetal heart rate patterns. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2018;43(2):90–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans MI, Britt DW, Eden RD, et al. The Fetal Reserve Index significantly outperforms ACOG category system in predicting cord blood base excess and pH: a methodological failure of the category system. Reprod Sci. 2019;26(6):858–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modanlou H, Yeh SY, Hon EH. Fetal and neonatal acid-base balance in normal and high-risk pregnancies: during labor and the first hour of life. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;43(3):347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross MG. Threshold of metabolic acidosis associated with newborn cerebral palsy: medical legal implications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):348–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross MG, Gala R. Use of umbilical artery base excess: algorithm for the timing of hypoxic injury. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandraharan E. Should national guidelines continue to recommend fetal scalp blood sampling during labor? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(22):3682–3685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsikouras P, Koukouli Z, Barbara N, et al. Predictive value of fetal scalp pH and base excess for fetal acidosis and poor neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(23):3166–3171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes-Pereira J, Costa A, Ayres-De-Campos D, et al. Computerized analysis of cardiotocograms and ST signals is associated with significant reductions in hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy and cesarean delivery: an observational study in 38,466 deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220:269 e1–e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes I, Ayres-de-Campos D, Ugwumadu A, et al. Central fetal monitoring with and without computer analysis: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):83–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocklehurst P, Field DJ, Juszczak E, et al. The INFANT trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10089):28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low JA. The role of blood gas and acid-base assessment in the diagnosis of intrapartum fetal asphyxia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;159(5):1235–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao M, Cortes M, Moore CS, et al. Fetal microglial phenotype in vitro carries memory of prior in vivo exposure to inflammation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:294–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews WW, Tita ATN. Fetal heart rate monitoring: still a mystery more than half a century later. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):469–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schifrin BS. Letter to the editor. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):1487–1488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagelin A, Leyon J. The effect of labor on the acid-base status of the newborn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77(8):841–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar