Research trends of pregnancy with scarred uterus after cesarean: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2018

References

• Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, et al. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG. 2016;123(5):667–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Mu Y, Li X, et al. Relaxation of the one child policy and trends in caesarean section rates and birth outcomes in China between 2012 and 2016: observational study of nearly seven million health facility births. BMJ. 2018;360:k817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunc SY, Agacayak E, Sak S, et al. Multiple repeat caesarean deliveries: do they increase maternal and neonatal morbidity? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(6):739–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrikovsky BM. Rupture of the scarred uterus: prediction and diagnosis. Lancet. 1996;347(9004):838–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights March 8–10, 2010. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1279–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen T. Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance. Ann Med. 1990;22(3):145–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang JW, Jun H. Trends in endovascular aneurysm repair research: bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2017. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019;96(2):47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadava SM, Patrick HS, Ananth CV, et al. Top-cited articles in the Journal: a bibliometric analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):12–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Garite TJ, Kim MH, et al. The new American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 years later: looking back and moving forward. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):364–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai X, Zhao J, Wang Y, et al. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on lncRNA: a swiftly expanding trend. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7625078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia ZJ, Hong B, Chen DM, et al. China's growing contribution to global intracranial aneurysm research (1991–2012): a bibliometric study. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronlund MM, Lehtonen OP, Eerola E, et al. Fecal microflora in healthy infants born by different methods of delivery: permanent changes in intestinal flora after cesarean delivery. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1999;28(1):19–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(1):3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rortveit G, Daltveit AK, Hannestad YS, et al. Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(10):900–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment Cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;21(3):220–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, et al. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(1):186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):917–927.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrouenraets FP, Roumen FJ, Dehing CJ, et al. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):690–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutchfield P, Whitaker R, Russell I, et al. Antenatal betamethasone and incidence of neonatal respiratory distress after elective caesarean section: pragmatic randomised trial. BMJ. 2005;331(7518):662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte H, Hannah ME, Saigal S, et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(3):864–871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabol B, Denman MA, Guise JM. Vaginal birth after cesarean: an effective method to reduce cesarean. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58(2):309–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010;191:1–397.
   Google Scholar
• Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, et al. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):571–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB, et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):806–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein D, Benshushan A, Tanos V, et al. Predictive score for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(1 Pt 1):192–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grisaru-Granovsky S, Bas-Lando M, Drukker L, et al. Epidural analgesia at trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC): a significant adjunct to successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). J Perinat Med. 2018;46(3):261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107(6):1373–1381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vial Y, Petignat P, Hohlfeld P. Pregnancy in a cesarean scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;16(6):592–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SR, Park SY, Park MH. Cesarean scar pregnancy associated with an impending uterine rupture diagnosed with 3-dimensional ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(5):531.e1–531.e2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin N, Li X, Song T, et al. The effect of collagen-binding vascular endothelial growth factor on the remodeling of scarred rat uterus following full-thickness injury. Biomaterials. 2012;33(6):1801–1807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Ding L, Wang L, et al. Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells on scaffolds facilitate collagen degradation via upregulation of MMP-9 in rat uterine scars. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2017;8(1):84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stidham RW, Sauder K, Higgins PDR. Using bibliometrics to advance your academic career. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):520–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar