Comparing fetal biometric growth velocity versus estimated fetal weight for prediction of neonatal small for gestational age

References

• McCowan LM, Figueras F, Anderson NH. Evidence‐based national guidelines for the management of suspected fetal growth restriction: comparison, consensus, and controversy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S855–S868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin No. 204: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ido P, Gale R, Laor A, et al. The cognitive outcome of full-term small for gestational age infants at late adolescence. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(3):452–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savchev S, Sanz‐Cortes M, Cruz‐Martinez R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of full‐term small‐for‐gestational‐age infants with normal placental function. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):201–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker DJ. The developmental origins of chronic adult disease. Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2004;93(446):26–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benton SJ, Hu Y, Xie F, et al. Can placental growth factor in maternal circulation identify fetuses with placental intrauterine growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(2):163.e1–163.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asvold BO, Vatten LJ, Romundstad PR, et al. Angiogenic factors in maternal circulation and the risk of severe fetal growth restriction. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(6):630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herraiz I, Droge LA, Gomez-Montes E, et al. Characterization of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 to placental growth factor ratio in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Rouvali A, Syngelaki A, et al. Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry and biomarkers at 35‐37 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(5):486.e1–486.e11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotiriadis A, Figueras F, Eleftheriades M, et al. First‐trimester and combined first‐ and second‐trimester prediction of small‐for‐gestational age and late fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, et al. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright D, Wright A, Smith E, et al. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small‐ and large‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(2):170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akolekar R, Panaitescu AM, Ciobanu A, et al. Two‐stage approach for prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35–37 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(4):484–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caradeux J, Eixarch E, Mazarico E, et al. Longitudinal growth assessment for prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses suspected to be small‐for‐gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(3):325–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovio U, White IR, Dacey A, et al. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2015;386(10008):2089–2097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Anthoulakis C, Syngelaki A, et al. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35–37 weeks’ gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(5):630–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro A, Veglia M, Svirko E, et al. Using fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity in the prediction of adverse outcome in near‐term small‐for‐gestational‐age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(4):494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caradeux J, Eixarch E, Mazarico E, et al. Second- to third-trimester longitudinal growth assessment for the prediction of small-for-gestational age and late fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):219–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen HO, Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, et al. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome of small‐for‐gestational‐age pregnancy using size centiles and conditional growth centiles. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(2):217–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, et al. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(11):1906–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg BO, Steegers EA, De Ridder M, et al. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy and assessment of fetal growth: longitudinal data from a population-based cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(4):388–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, et al. Fetal imaging: executive summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Radiology, Society for Pediatric Radiology, and Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Fetal Imaging Workshop. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(5):745–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37(1):116–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GR, Himes JH, Kaufman RB, et al. A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(2):163–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unterscheider J, Daly S, Geary MP, et al. Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):290.e1–290.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, et al. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks’ gestation: prediction of small‐for‐gestational‐age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar