Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 20
Submit an article Journal homepage
173
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Morbidity associated with the use of Foley balloon for cervical ripening in women with prior cesarean delivery

Jessika A. Ralpha Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
,
Heidi K. Leftwichb Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
,
Katherine Leungb Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
,
Mary N. Zakic Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
,
Micaela Della Torrec Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, University of Illinois-Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
&
Judith U. Hibbarda Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of OB/GYN, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Pages 3937-3942 | Received 11 May 2020, Accepted 27 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Nov 2020

References

  • Practice Bulletin No. 184. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):e217–e33.
  • Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(25):2581–2589.
  • Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB, et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(5):1656–1662.
  • Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, et al. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(1):3–8.
  • Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2010;191:1–397.
  • Ravasia DJ, Wood SL, Pollard JK. Uterine rupture during induced trial of labor among women with previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(5):1176–1179.
  • Jozwiak M, ten Eikelder M, Oude Rengerink K, et al. Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol: randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-M study) and systematic review and meta-analysis of literature. Am J Perinatol. 2014;31(2):145–156.
  • Bujold E, Blackwell SC, Gauthier RJ. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(1):18–23.
  • Hoffman MK, Sciscione A, Srinivasana M, et al. Uterine rupture in patients with a prior cesarean delivery: the impact of cervical ripening. Am J Perinatol. 2004;21(4):217–222.
  • Wallstrom T, Bjorklund J, Frykman J, et al. Induction of labor after one previous cesarean section in women with an unfavorable cervix: aretrospective cohort study. PLOS One. 2018;13(7):e0200024
  • Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–381.
  • Duff P, Huff RW, Gibbs RS. Management of premature rupture of membranes and unfavorable cervix in term pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1984;63(5):697–702.
  • Edwards RK, Szychowski JM, Berger JL, et al. Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1280–1287.
  • Ben-Aroya Z, Hallak M, Segal D, et al. Ripening of the uterine cervix in a post-cesarean parturient: prostaglandin E2 versus Foley catheter. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2002;12(1):42–45.
  • Baacke KA, Edwards RK. Preinduction cervical assessment. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(3):564–572.
  • Laughon SK, Zhang J, Troendle J, et al. Using a simplified Bishop score to predict vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117(4):805–811.
  • Kruit H, Wilkman H, Tekay A, et al. Induction of labor by Foley catheter compared with spontaneous onset of labor after previous cesarean section: a cohort study. J Perinatol. 2017;37(7):787–792.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.