Application of new fetal growth standards in a multiethnic population

References

• Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):318.e1-6–318.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llurba E, Baschat AA, Turan OM, et al. Childhood cognitive development after fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(4):383–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcangeli T, Thilaganathan B, Hooper R, et al. Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;40(3):267–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindqvist PG, Molin J. Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(3):258–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monier I, Blondel B, Ego A, et al. Poor effectiveness of antenatal detection of fetal growth restriction and consequences for obstetric management and neonatal outcomes: a French national study. BJOG. 2015;122(4):518–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Duyme M, et al. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25(6):559–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomon LJ, Duyme M, Crequat J, et al. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(2):193–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoud M, Duyme M, Fontanges M, et al. [Chart for estimation of fetal weight 2014 by the French College of Fetal Sonography (CFEF)]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2016;45(1):80–85.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, et al. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(3):333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ego A, Prunet C, Lebreton E, et al. [Customized and non-customized French intrauterine growth curves. I – methodology]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2016;45(2):155–164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iliodromiti S, Mackay DF, Smith GCS, et al. Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland. PLOS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carberry AE, Raynes-Greenow CH, Turner RM, et al. Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(8):1301–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, et al. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014; 384(9946):869–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Altman DG, Purwar M, et al. The objectives, design and implementation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013;120 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):9–26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Sarris I, Ioannou C, et al. Ultrasound methodology used to construct the fetal growth standards in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2013;120(Suppl 2):27–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stirnemann JJ, Fries N, Bessis R, et al. Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards in France: a 'flash study' of the College Français d'Echographie Foetale (CFEF). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammami A, Mazer Zumaeta A, Syngelaki A, et al. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirnemann J, Salomon LJ, Papageorghiou A. The Intergrowth standards for Hadlock’s estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. DOI:10.1002/uog.22000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Chitty LS. New charts for ultrasound dating of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;10(3):174–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, Sentilhes L, Ego A, et al. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;193:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• rapportCTE.pdf [Internet] Available from: http://www.cfef.org/archives/lettres/DocusCTE/rapportCTE.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gordijn SJ, Beune IM
   Google Scholar
  , Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulaveris G, Gallagher P, Romney E, et al. Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;27:1–181.
   Google Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Fratelli N, Leslie K, et al. Outcome of fetuses with antenatally diagnosed short femur. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;31(5):507–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, et al. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks’ gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(6):761–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boers KE, Vijgen SMC, Bijlenga D, et al. Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ. 2010;341:c7087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond DM, Gordon A, Hyett J, et al. Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11):CD009433. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyronnet V, Sibiude J, Mandelbrot L, et al. Impact of the detection of small for gestational age fetuses on the neonatal prognosis. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018;46(2):71–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veglia M, Cavallaro A, Papageorghiou A, et al. Small-for-gestational-age babies after 37 weeks: impact study of risk-stratification protocol. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):66–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heude B, Le Guern M, Forhan A, et al. Are selection criteria for healthy pregnancies responsible for the gap between fetal growth in the French national Elfe birth cohort and the Intergrowth-21st fetal growth standards? Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019;33(1):47–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar