References
- Jia Y-J, Chen X, Cui H-Y, et al. Physiological CTG interpretation: the significance of baseline fetal heart rate changes after the onset of decelerations and associated perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019:1–6.
- Ugwumadu A. Are we (mis)guided by current guidelines on intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring? Case for a more physiological approach to interpretation. BJOG. 2014;121(9):1063–1070.
- Chandraharan E. Applying fetal physiology to interpret CTG traces. In: Chandraharan E, editor. Handbook of CTG interpretation: from patterns to physiology. 1st ed. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2017. p. 32–44.
- Cahill AG, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA. Association and prediction of neonatal acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):206.e1
- Helwig JT, Parer JT, Kilpatrick SJ, et al. Umbilical cord blood acid-base state: what is normal? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174(6):1807–1812.
- Sholapurkar SL. Study of interpretation of cardiotocography educational illustrations by experts discarding early/late/variable deceleration categorization – physiology or unscientific ideology, myths and road to perdition? Ann Obstet Gynecol. 2019;2(1):1010–1019.
- Sholapurkar SL. Scientific pathophysiology of intrapartum fetal hypoxemia and cardiotocography pattern recognition–realignment is a basic prerequisite! Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):282–283.
- Lear CA, Galinsky R, Wassink G, et al. The myths and physiology surrounding intrapartum decelerations: the critical role of the peripheral chemoreflex. J Physiol. 2016;594(17):4711–4725.
- Sholapurkar SL. Myths at the core of intrapartum cardiotocography interpretation – risks of false ideology, prospect theory and way forward. Clin Obstet Gynecol Reprod Med. 2019;5:1–9.