https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9862-1619
References
- Hellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T. China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015;122(2):160–164.
- Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014;383(9927):1463–1464.
- Sananès N, Rodriguez M, Stora C, et al. Efficacy and safety of labour induction in patients with a single previous caesarean section: a proposal for a clinical protocol. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;290(4):669–676.
- Studsgaard A, Skorstengaard M, Glavind J, et al. Trial of labor compared to repeat cesarean section in women with no other risk factors than a prior cesarean delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(11):1256–1263.
- Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M. Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of caesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):365.
- Bano R, Mushtaq A, Adhi M, et al. Rates of caesarean section and trials and success of vaginal birth after caesarean sections in secondary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65(1):81–83.
- Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, et al. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;329(7456):19–25.
- Kok N, Wiersma IC, Opmeer BC, et al. Sonographic measurement of lower uterine segment thickness to predict uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with previous Cesarean section: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(2):132–139.
- Jha NNS, Maheshwari S, Barala S. Ultrasonographic assessment of strength of previous scar during pregnancy. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2018;7(4):1458–1463.
- Uharček P, Brešťanský A, Ravinger J, et al. Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous caesarean delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292(3):609–612.
- Sarwar I, Akram F, Khan A, et al. Validity of transabdominal ultrasound scan in the prediction of uterine scar thickness. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2020;32(1):68–72.
- Bujold E, Jastrow N, Simoneau J, et al. Prediction of complete uterine rupture by sonographic evaluation of the lower uterine segment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:320e1–320e6.
- Cui X, Wu S. Ultrasonic assessment has high sensitivity for pregnant women with previous cesarean section occurring uterine dehiscence and rupture: a STARD-compliant article. Medicine. 2020;99(31):e21448.
- Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, van der Voet LF, et al. Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):85.
- Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, McCurdy R, et al. Risk of cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;50(5):578–583.
- Okada Y, Hasegawa J, Mimura T, et al. Uterine rupture at 10 weeks of gestation after laparoscopic myomectomy. J Med Ultrason. 2016;43(1):133–6.
- )Thisted DLA, Mortensen LH, Hvidman L, et al. Operative technique at caesarean delivery and risk of complete uterine rupture in a subsequent trial of labour at term. A registry case-control study. PLOS One. 2017;12(11):e0187850.
- Soltsman S, Perlitz Y, Ben Ami M, et al. Uterine rupture after previous low segment transverse cesarean is rarely catastrophic. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:708–712.
- Gonzalez N, Tulandi T. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(5):731–738.
- )di Pasquo E, Kiener AJO, DallAsta A, et al. Evaluation of the uterine scar stiffness in women with previous cesarean section by ultrasound elastography: a cohort study. Clin Imaging. 2020;64:53–56.