93
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Modeling gestational age centiles for fetal umbilicocerebral ratio by quantile regression analysis: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 4381-4385 | Received 06 Oct 2020, Accepted 05 Nov 2020, Published online: 23 Nov 2020

References

  • Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):298–312.
  • Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Kennedy SH, et al. Predictive accuracy of cerebroplacental ratio for adverse perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcomes in suspected fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(4):430–441.
  • Rizzo G, Mappa I, Bitsadze V, et al. Role of Doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by late‐onset fetal growth restriction at the time of diagnosis: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(6):793–798. doi:10.1002/uog.20406
  • Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):54.e1–54.e10.
  • Morales-Roselló J, Khalil A, Morlando M, et al. Poor neonatal acid-base status in term fetuses with low cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):156–161.
  • Stampalija T, Arabin B, Wolf H, TRUFFLE investigators, et al. Is middle cerebral artery Doppler related to neonatal and 2-year infant outcome in early fetal growth restriction? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;216(5):521.e1–521.e13.
  • Stampalija T, Thornton J, Marlow N, et al. Fetal cerebral Doppler changes and outcome in late preterm fetal growth restriction: prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):173–181.
  • Kalafat E, Khalil A. Umbilicocerebral ratio: potential implications of inversing the cerebroplacental ratio. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):159–162.
  • Wolf H, Stampalija T, Monasta L, et al. Ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility indices in assessment of fetal risk: numerator and denominator matter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):163–165.
  • Kalafat E, Ozturk E, Kalaylioglu Z, et al. Re: Ratio of umbilical and cerebral artery pulsatility indices in assessment of fetal risk: numerator and denominator matter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):290–292.
  • Arduini D, Rizzo G. Prediction of fetal outcome in small for gestational age fetuses: comparison of Doppler measurements obtained from different fetal vessels. J Perinat Med. 1992;20(1):29–38.
  • Hecher K, Spernol R, Stettner H, et al. Potential for diagnosing imminent risk to appropriate- and small-for-gestational-age fetuses by Doppler sonographic examination of umbilical and cerebral arterial blood flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1992;2(4):266–271.
  • Harrington K, Carpenter RG, Nguyen M, et al. Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross- sectional analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6(1):19–28.
  • Arduini D, Rizzo G. Normal values of pulsatility index from fetal vessels: a cross-sectional study on 1556 healthy fetuses. J Perinat Med. 1990;18(3):165–172.
  • Oros D, Ruiz-Martinez S, Staines Urias E, et al. Reference ranges for Doppler indices of umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries and cerebroplacental ratio: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):454–464.
  • Rizzo G, Pietrolucci ME, Mappa I, et al. Modeling pulsatility index nomograms from different maternal and fetal vessels by quantile regression at 24–40 weeks of gestation: a prospective cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020.DOI:10.1080/14767058.2020.1767060
  • Bertino E, Spada E, Occhi L, et al. Neonatal anthropometric charts: the Italian neonatal study compared with other European studies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;5:353–361.
  • Bhide A, Acharya G, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(2):233–239.
  • Wei Y, Pere A, Koenker R, et al. Quantile regression methods for reference growth charts. Stat Med. 2006;25(8):1369–1382.
  • Koenker R. Quantreg: an R package for quantile regression and related methods. The Comprehensive R Archive Network Website. 2004; [cited 2020 Oct 3]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org
  • Drukker L, Staines-Urias E, Villar J, et al. International gestational age- specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal pro- spective cohort study of the Intergrowth-21st Project. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):602.e1–15–602.e15.
  • Rizzo G, Mappa I, D’Antonio F. Letter to Editor International gestational age-specific centiles for umbilical artery Doppler indices: a longitudinal prospective cohort study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020:S0002-9378(20)30992-3.DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.110
  • Acharya G, Ebbing C, Karlsen HO, et al. Sex-specific reference ranges of cerebroplacental and umbilicocerebral ratios: longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):187–195.
  • Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, Buca D, et al. Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:439–443.
  • D’Antonio F, Rizzo G, Gustapane S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in pregnancies at term: a prospective longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(1):42–47.
  • Buca D, Rizzo G, Gustapane S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in appropriate for gestational age fetuses: a prospective study. Ultraschall Med. 2020. DOI:10.1055/a-1072-5161
  • Perinatal and 2-year neurodevelopmental outcome in late preterm fetal compromise: the TRUFFLE 2 Randomized Trial. NIHR127976. 2020; [cited 2020 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR127976.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.