Risk for complications in the subsequent pregnancy following first versus second-stage cesarean delivery: 25 years follow-up in a large cohort

References

• World Health Organization. World health statistics 2016: monitoring health for the SDGs sustainable development goals. World Health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Caesarean section rates, 2015 (or nearest year). Health care activities. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(3):693–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman EA. Classic pages in obstetrics and gynecology. The graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(7):822–823.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman EA. Evolution of graphic analysis of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;132(7):824–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):1281–1287. Dec
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman SG. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Elsevier, Inc; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Leveno KJ, Nelson DB, McIntire DD. Second-stage labor: how long is too long? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):484–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lurie S, Raz N, Boaz M, et al. Comparison of maternal outcomes from primary cesarean section during the second compared with first stage of labor by indication for the operation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014;182:43–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuuli MG, Liu L, Longman RE, et al. Infectious morbidity is higher after second-stage compared with first-stage cesareans. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):410.e1–410.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander JM, Leveno KJ, Rouse DJ, et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109(4):917–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikhareva O, Rickle GS, Lavesson T, et al. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):438–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Rosner-Tenerowicz A, et al. Morphology of the cesarean section scar in the non-pregnant uterus after one elective cesarean section. Ginekol Pol. 2017;88(4):174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahendroo M. Cervical hyaluronan biology in pregnancy, parturition and preterm birth. Matrix Biol. 2019;78:24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Paraskevaidi M, et al. Adverse obstetric outcomes after local treatment for cervical preinvasive and early invasive disease according to cone depth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;354:i3633.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rotem R, Bitensky S, Pariente G, et al. Placental complications in subsequent pregnancies after prior cesarean section performed in the first versus second stage of labor. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;30:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Frey HA, Klebanoff MA. The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(2):68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abildgaard H, Ingerslev MD, Nickelsen C, et al. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia – effect on subsequent trial of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(2):193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewkowitz AK, Nakagawa S, Thiet MP, et al. Effect of stage of initial labor dystocia on vaginal birth after cesarean success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(6):861.e1–861.e5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias T, Sheiner E, Friger M, et al. Does dystocia during labor pose a risk factor for another non-progressive labor during the subsequent delivery? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;28(9):1099–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasseen Iii AS, Bassil K, Sprague A, et al. Late preterm birth and previous cesarean section: a population-based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(14):2400–2407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine LD, Sammel MD, Hirshberg A, et al. Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):360.e1–360.e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella V, Gimovsky AC, Levine LD, et al. Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinones JN, Gomez D, Hoffman MK, et al. Length of the second stage of labor and preterm delivery risk in the subsequent pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;219(5):467.e1–467.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016;353:i1753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbing C, Rasmussen S, Skjaerven R, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(2):243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell KR, Powell TL. Effects of maternal obesity on placental function and fetal development. Reproduction. 2017;153(3):R97–R108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaergaard H, Olsen J, Ottesen B, et al. Incidence and outcomes of dystocia in the active phase of labor in term nulliparous women with spontaneous labor onset. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(4):402–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah PS, Zao J. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses. BJOG. 2009;116(11):1425–1442. Oct
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar