334
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Impact of a delayed cord clamping protocol on maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing term cesarean section

, , , &
Pages 4607-4611 | Received 03 Jul 2020, Accepted 25 Nov 2020, Published online: 07 Dec 2020

References

  • Dunn PM. Dr Erasmus Darwin (1731–1802) of Lichfield and placental respiration. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003;88(4):F346–8.
  • Brocato B, Holliday N, Whitehurst RM, Jr, et al. Delayed cord clamping in preterm neonates: a review of benefits and risks. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2016;71(1):39–42.
  • Rabe H, Diaz-Rossello JL, Duley L, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping and other strategies to influence placental transfusion at preterm birth on maternal and infant outcomes [Cochrane Systematic Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; Version published: 15 August 2012.
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 543: timing of umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(6):1522–1526.
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 684: delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(1):e5–e10.
  • McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, et al. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes [Cochrane Systematic Review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; Version published: 11 July 2013.
  • Jelin AC, Kuppermann M, Erickson K, et al. Obstetricians’ attitudes and beliefs regarding umbilical cord clamping. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(14):1457–1461.
  • Ladella S, Nguyen L, O’Byrne H, et al. Quantitative blood loss is a more accurate measure of blood loss compared to estimated blood loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131:156S.
  • Committee on Obstetric Practice, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 794: quantitative blood loss in obstetric hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(6):e150–e156.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.