Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 36, 2023 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,804
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Cesarean section in the second stage of labor is associated with early-term and late preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies

Aviad Sapira The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, IsraelView further author information
,
Lior Friedricha The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, IsraelView further author information
,
Roni Gata The Joyce & Irving Goldman Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, IsraelView further author information
&
Offer Erezb Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel;c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne Satet University, Detroit, MI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Article: 2175658 | Received 30 Apr 2022, Accepted 20 Jan 2023, Published online: 26 Feb 2023

References

  • Piper JM, Bolling DR, Newton ER. The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165(4 Pt 1):976–979.
  • World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445.
  • Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–193.
  • Vousden N, Cargill Z, Briley A, et al. Caesarean section at full dilatation: incidence, impact and current management. Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;16(3):199–205.
  • Unterscheider J, McMenamin M, Cullinane F. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;157(2):141–144.
  • Berghella V, Gimovsky AC, Levine LD, et al. Cesarean in the second stage: a possible risk factor for subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):1–3.
  • Williams C, Fong R, Murray SM, et al. Caesarean birth and risk of subsequent preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2021;128(6):1020–1028.
  • Koyama S, Tomimatsu T, Kanagawa T, et al. Cervical insufficiency following cesarean delivery after prolonged second stage of labor: experiences of two cases. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(2):411–413.
  • Arbyn M, Kyrgiou M, Simoens C, et al. Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008;337:a1284.
  • Wood SL, Tang S, Crawford S. Cesarean delivery in the second stage of labor and the risk of subsequent premature birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217(1):63–e1.
  • Watson HA, Carter J, David AL, et al. Full dilation cesarean section: a risk factor for recurrent second‐trimester loss and preterm birth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(9):1100–1105.
  • Levine LD, Sammel MD, Hirshberg A, et al. Does stage of labor at time of cesarean delivery affect risk of subsequent preterm birth? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):360.e1.
  • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 142. Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(2 Pt 1):372–379.
  • Zhang Y, Zhou J, Ma Y, et al. Mode of delivery and preterm birth in subsequent births: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213784.
  • Offringa Y, Paret L, Vayssiere C, et al. Second stage cesarean section and the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022;159(3):783–789.
  • Loudon JAZ, Groom KM, Hinkson L, et al. Changing trends in operative delivery performed at full dilatation over a 10-year period. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(4):370–375.
  • Wang M, Kirby A, Gibbs E, et al. Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid‐cavity instrumental delivery. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;60(3):382–388.
  • Lodge-Tulloch NA, Elias FTS, Pudwell J, et al. Caesarean section in pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):1–13.
  • Stojnic J, Radunovic N, Jeremic K, et al. Perinatal outcome of singleton pregnancies following in vitro fertilization. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2013;40(2):277–283.
  • Tomic V, Tomic J. Neonatal outcome of IVF singletons versus naturally conceived in women aged 35 years and over. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284(6):1411–1416.
  • Besser L, Sabag-Shaviv L, Yitshak-Sade M, et al. Medically indicated late preterm delivery and its impact on perinatal morbidity and mortality: a retrospective population-based cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(19):3278–3287.
  • Sengupta S, Carrion V, Shelton J, et al. Adverse neonatal outcomes associated with early-term birth. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(11):1053–1059.
  • Parikh LI, Reddy UM, Männistö T, et al. Neonatal outcomes in early term birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(3):265–2e1.
  • Iams JD. Late preterm birth: more and better data needed. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(5):395.
  • Israeli Centre Bureau of Statistics. Characterization and Classification of Geographical Units by the Socio-Economic Level of the Population; 2013.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.