1,074
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Obstetric pelvimetry by three-dimensional computed tomography in non-pregnant Japanese women: a retrospective single-center study

, , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2190444 | Received 20 Jul 2022, Accepted 08 Mar 2023, Published online: 16 Mar 2023

References

  • Harper LM, Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, et al. Radiographic measures of the mid pelvis to predict cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(6):460 e461–466.
  • Kochi Y, Araki H, Ojima N, et al. Report of the subcommittee on pelvic size. Acta Obstetrica et Gynaecologica Japonica. 1972;24(2):172–173.
  • Lenhard MS, Johnson TR, Weckbach S, et al. Pelvimetry revisited: analyzing cephalopelvic disproportion. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):e107–111.
  • Liao KD, Yu YH, Li YG, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance pelvimetry: a new technique for evaluating the female pelvis in pregnancy. Eur J Radiol. 2018;102:208–212.
  • Capelle C, Devos P, Caudrelier C, et al. How reproducible are classical and new CT-pelvimetry measurements? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2020;101(2):79–89.
  • Perlman S, Raviv-Zilka L, Levinsky D, et al. The birth canal: correlation between the pubic arch angle, the interspinous diameter, and the obstetrical conjugate: a computed tomography biometric study in reproductive age women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(19):3255–3265.
  • Franz M, von Bismarck A, Delius M, et al. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(2):351–359.
  • Di Pasquo E, Volpe N, Labadini C, et al. Antepartum evaluation of the obstetric conjugate at transabdominal 2D ultrasound: a feasibility study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(10):1917–1923.
  • Katanozaka M, Yoshinaga M, Fuchiwaki K, et al. Measurement of obstetric conjugate by ultrasonic tomography and its significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1 Pt 1):159–162.
  • VanSickle C, Liese KL, Rutherford JN. Textbook typologies: challenging the myth of the perfect obstetric pelvis. Anat Rec. 2022;305(4):952–967.
  • Narumoto K, Sugimura M, Saga K, et al. Changes in pelvic shape among Japanese pregnant women over the last 5 decades. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(11):1687–1692.
  • Wells JC, DeSilva JM, Stock JT. The obstetric dilemma: an ancient game of russian roulette, or a variable dilemma sensitive to ecology? Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;149(55):40–71.