1,457
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Outcomes in low-risk patients before and after an institutional policy offering 39-week elective induction of labor

, , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2295223 | Received 29 Aug 2023, Accepted 11 Dec 2023, Published online: 20 Dec 2023

References

  • American College of O, Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal M., et al. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210(3):179–193.
  • Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, et al. Births: final data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 ;72(1):1–53.
  • Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(1):36 e1-5–36.e5. discussion 91-2e7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.007.
  • Ehrenthal DB, Hoffman MK, Jiang X, et al. Neonatal outcomes after implementation of guidelines limiting elective delivery before 39 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1047–1055. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182319c58.
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
  • Luthy DA, Malmgren JA, Zingheim RW. Cesarean delivery after elective induction in nulliparous women: the physician effect. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191(5):1511–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.001.
  • Maslow AS, Sweeny AL. Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95(6 Pt 1):917–922. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200006000-00026.
  • Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol ML, et al. Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94(4):600–607. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199910000-00022.
  • Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, et al. Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):282–287. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003371.
  • Sinkey RG, Lacevic J, Reljic T, et al. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: the impact on maternal and neonatal risk. PLOS One. 2018;13(4):e0193169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193169.
  • Marconi AM. Recent advances in the induction of labor. F1000Res. 2019;8:1829. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17587.1.
  • Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women: correction. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;134(4):884
  • Bulletins ACoOaGCoOPaCoP. Clinical Guidance for Integration of the Findings of The ARRIVE Trial: labor Induction Versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. 2018.
  • Ausbeck EB, Jauk VC, Xue Y, et al. Outpatient foley catheter for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(3):597–606. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004041.
  • El-Sayed YY, Rice MM, Grobman WA, et al. Elective labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation compared with expectant management: factors associated with adverse outcomes in low-risk nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(4):692–697. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004055.
  • Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B, et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(1):26–35. doi: 10.1002/uog.20140.
  • Sanusi A, Ye Y, Battarbee AN, et al. Predicting spontaneous labor beyond 39 weeks among low-risk expectantly managed pregnant patients. Am J Perinatol. 2023;40(16):1725–1731. doi: 10.1055/a-2099-4395.