1,466
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean sections: a system review and meta-analysis

, , , &
Article: 2313356 | Received 04 Nov 2023, Accepted 28 Jan 2024, Published online: 11 Feb 2024

References

  • Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(6):1. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671.
  • Watson SE, Richardson AL, Lucas DN. Neuraxial and general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):53–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.04.007.
  • Halliday L, Nelson SM, Kearns RJ. Epidural analgesia in labor: a narrative review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;159(2):356–364. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14175.
  • Bamber JH, Lucas DN, Russell R, et al. Obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK: a descriptive analysis of the national obstetric anaesthetic database 2009-14. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125(4):580–587. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.053.
  • Reschke MM, Monks DT, Varaday SS, et al. Choice of local anaesthetic for epidural caesarean section: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2019;75(5):674–682. doi: 10.1111/anae.14966.
  • Calder A, Bell GT, Andersson M, et al. Pharmacokinetic profiles of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine following single-shot and continuous epidural use in young infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(5):430–437. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2011.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
  • Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343(oct18 2):d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
  • Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.
  • Danielle LC, Mark CK, Zachary LM, et al. Pectoral nerve blocks and postoperative pain outcomes after mastectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44(10):923–928. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100658.
  • Zhang YJ, Zhang L, Chen SY, et al. Association between VDR polymorphisms and multiple sclerosis: systematic review and updated meta-analysis of case-control studies. Neurol Sci. 2018;39(2):225–234. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3175-3.
  • Griffin RP, Reynolds F. Extradural anaesthesia for caesarean section: a double-blind comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine with 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1995;74(5):512–516. doi: 10.1093/bja/74.5.512.
  • Datta S, Camann W, Bader A, et al. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1995;82(6):1346–1352. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199506000-00004.
  • Crosby E, Sandler A, Finucane B, et al. Comparison of epidural anaesthesia with ropivacaine 0.5% and bupivacaine 0.5% for caesarean section. Can J Anaesth. 1998;45(11):1066–1071. doi: 10.1111/anae.14966.
  • Bjørnestad E, Smedvig JP, Bjerkreim T, et al. Epidural ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml for elective caesarean section: a double-blind comparison of efficacy and tolerability with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43(6):603–608. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430602.x.
  • Côrtes CAF, Oliveira AS, Castro LFL, et al. Comparative study between 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% enantiomeric mixture of bupivacaine (S75-R25) and 0.75% ropivacaine, all associated to fentanyl, for epidural cesarean section anesthesia. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2003;53(2):177–187. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942003000200005.
  • Kampe S, Tausch B, Paul M, et al. Epidural block with ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective caesarean section: maternal cardiovascular parameters, comfort and neonatal well-being. Curr Med Res Opin. 2004;20(1):7–12. doi: 10.1185/030079903125002649.
  • Christelis N, Harrad J, Howell PR. A comparison of epidural ropivacaine 0.75% and bupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl for elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2005;14(3):212–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.01.002.
  • Hafez M, Helmy N. Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean section: effect on maternal and fetal hemodynamica. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33(Sup 1):e14. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199506000-00004.
  • Pérez-Jiménez JM, Luque-Oliveros M, Gonzalez-Perez D, et al. Does immediate skin-to-skin contact at caesarean sections promote uterine contraction and recovery of the maternal blood haemoglobin levels? A randomized clinical trial. Nurs Open. 2023;10(2):649–657. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1331.
  • Klimek M, Rossaint R, van de Velde M, et al. Combined spinal-epidural vs. spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: meta-analysis and trial-sequential analysis. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(7):875–888. doi: 10.1111/anae.14210.
  • Stav M, Matatov Y, Hoffmann D, et al. Incidence of conversion to general anaesthesia and need for intravenous supplementation in parturients undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: a retrospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023;67(1):29–35. doi: 10.1111/aas.14146.
  • Devroe S, Van de Velde M, Rex S. General anesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015;28(3):240–246. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000185.
  • Pombo A, Cardoso TM, Araújo AM, et al. Airway approach for caesarean section under general anaesthesia: a national survey. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2023;56:103920. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2023.103920.
  • Kula AO, Riess ML, Ellinas EH. Increasing body mass index predicts increasing difficulty, failure rate, and time to discovery of failure of epidural anesthesia in laboring patients. J Clin Anesth. 2017;37:154–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.11.010
  • Eley VA, Chin A, Tham I, et al. Epidural extension failure in obese women is comparable to that of non-obese women. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(6):839–847. doi: 10.1111/aas.13085.
  • Chao WH, Cheng WS, Hu LM, et al. Risk factors for epidural anesthesia blockade failure in cesarean section: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023;23(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02284-w.
  • Mankowitz SK, Gonzalez Fiol A, Smiley R. Failure to extend epidural labor analgesia for cesarean delivery anesthesia: a focused review. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(5):1174–1180. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001437.
  • Ratnayake G, Patil V. General anaesthesia during caesarean sections: implications for the mother, foetus, anaesthetist and obstetrician. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(6):393–402. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000575.
  • Feng G, Wang Y, Feng J, et al. The relationship between core temperature and perioperative shivering during caesarean section under intrathecal anesthesia with bupivacaine and ropivacaine: a randomized controlled study. J Anesth. 2021;35(6):889–895. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02995-9.
  • Schug SA, Saunders D, Kurowski I, et al. Neuraxial drug administration a review of treatment options for anesthesia and analgesia. CNS Drugs. 2006;20(11):917–933. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200620110-00005.
  • Althaus J, Wax J. Analgesia and anesthesia in labor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2005;32(2):231–244. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2005.01.002.
  • Kakunje R, Sethuramachandran A, Parida S, et al. Effects of adding low-dose clonidine to intrathecal hyperbaric ropivacaine: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2016;10(1):38–44. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.
  • Fitzgerald JP, Fedoruk KA, Jadin SM, et al. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Anaesthesia. 2020;75(1):109–121. doi: 10.1111/anae.14841.
  • Sharkey AM, Siddiqui N, Downey K, et al. Comparison of intermittent intravenous boluses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine to prevent and treat Spinal-Induced hypotension in cesarean deliveries: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(5):1312–1318. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003704.
  • Langesæter E, Dyer RA. Maternal haemodynamic changes during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(3):242–248. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834588c5.
  • Lee A, Ngan Kee W. Effects of vasoactive medications and maternal positioning during cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and neonatal Acid-Base status. Clin Perinatol. 2019;46(4):765–783. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.009.
  • Abdollahpour A, Azadi R, Bandari R, et al. Effects of adding midazolam and sufentanil to intrathecal bupivacaine on analgesia quality and postoperative complications in elective cesarean section. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(4):e23565. doi: 10.5812/aapm.23565.
  • Jain A, Gray M, Slisz S, et al. Shivering treatments for targeted temperature management: a review. J Neurosci Nurs. 2018;50(2):63–67. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000340.
  • Morrison SF, Nakamura K. Central neural pathways for thermoregulation. Front Biosci. 2011;16(1):74–104. doi: 10.2741/3677.
  • Wódarski B, Chutkowski R, Banasiewicz J, et al. Risk factors for shivering during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. A prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(1):112–116. doi: 10.1111/aas.13462.
  • Dinges HC, Al-Dahna T, Rücker G, et al. Pharmacologic interventions for the therapy of postanesthetic shivering in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2023;89(10):923–935. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.23.17410-4.
  • Liu J, Wang Y, Ma W. Shivering prevention and treatment during cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018;84(12):1393–1405. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.18.12478-3.
  • Griffiths JD, Gyte GM, Paranjothy S, et al. Interventions for preventing nausea and vomiting in women undergoing regional anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2012(9):CD007579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007579.pub2.
  • Niu K, Liu H, Chen R-W, et al. Use of propofol for prevention of post-delivery nausea during cesarean section: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Anesth. 2018;32(5):748–755. doi: 10.1007/s00540-018-2549-x.
  • Chen H-Y, Chauhan SP. Apgar score at 10 minutes and adverse outcomes among low-risk pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):7109–7118. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1943659.
  • Ogunyemi D, Jovanovski A, Friedman P, et al. Temporal and quantitative associations of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring patterns and neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(18):3115–3124. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1456523.
  • Aksoy M, Dostbil A, Aksoy AN, et al. Granisetron or ondansentron to prevent hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110469. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110469.
  • Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(1):71–92. doi: 10.1111/anae.14080.
  • Singh PM, Singh NP, Reschke M, et al. Vasopressor drugs for the prevention and treatment of hypotension during neuraxial anaesthesia for caesarean delivery: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of fetal and maternal outcomes. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124(3):e95–e107. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.045.