Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers

References

• Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy: ISUOG guidelines. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):1–10. doi:10.1002/uog.15821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan A, Scott J, Nguyen AM, et al. Pregnancy outcome in South Australia 2007. Adelaide: Pregnancy Outcome Unit, SA Health, Government of South Australia; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott JP. High-order multiple gestations. Semin Perinatol. 2005;29(5):305–311. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2005.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws. Australia’s mothers and babies 2006, summary. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2008 Dec 9 [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies-2006/summary
   Google Scholar
• Tucker J, McGuire W. Epidemiology of preterm birth. BMJ. 2004;329(7467):675–678. doi:10.1136/bmj.329.7467.675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Multiple pregnancy: the management of twin and triplet pregnancies in the antenatal period. London: RCOG Press; 2011 Sep.
   Google Scholar
• Badr DA, Bevilacqua E, Carlin A, et al. Antenatal management and neonatal outcomes of monochorionic twin pregnancies in a tertiary teaching hospital: a 10-year review. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;41(8):1199–1204. doi:10.1080/01443615.2020.1854698.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sebire NJ, Snijders RJ, Hughes K, et al. The hidden mortality of monochorionic twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104(10):1203–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10948.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badr DA, Carlin A, Kang X, et al. Evaluation of the new expert consensus-based definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(12):2338–2344. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1786053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad KR, Saheb W, Jarjour I, et al. Delayed-interval-delivery of twins in didelphys uterus complicated with chorioamnionitis: a case report and a brief review of literature. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(17):3318–3322. doi:10.1080/14767058.2020.1818211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navaratnam K, Khairudin D, Chilton R, et al. Foetal loss after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis in twin pregnancies: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Prenat Diagn. 2022;42(12):1554–1561. doi:10/pd6237-sup-0003-table_s3.docx.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel JP, Holloway E, Cuesta C, et al. Outcomes of non-vertex second twins, following vertex vaginal delivery of first twin: a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):55. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korb D, Deneux-Tharaux C, Seco A, et al. Risk of severe acute maternal morbidity according to planned mode of delivery in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(3):647–655. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Carnavalet CdC, Azria E, et al. Neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancy according to the planned mode of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(3):695–703. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e318163c435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen SW, Fung KFK, Oppenheimer L, et al. Occurrence and predictors of cesarean delivery for the second twin after vaginal delivery of the first twin. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(3):413–419. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000110248.32558.fb.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wen SW, Chen Y, et al. Occurrence and clinical predictors of operative delivery for the vertex second twin after normal vaginal delivery of the first twin. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(1):178–184. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.06.084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wen SW, Chen Y, et al. Neonatal death and morbidity in vertex-nonvertex second twins according to mode of delivery and birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192(3):840–847. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.09.132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenckus DJ, Gao W, Kominiarek MA, et al. The effects of labor and delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes in term twins: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(9):1137–1144. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett JFR, Hannah ME, Hutton EK, et al. A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(14):1295–1305. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1214939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Prunet C, Azria E, et al. Association between planned cesarean delivery and neonatal mortality and morbidity in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(6):986–995. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafarmand MH, Goossens SMTA, Tajik P, et al. Planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twins: secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(4):582–591. doi:10.1002/uog.21907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz T, Korb D, Azria E, et al. Perinatal outcome after planned vaginal delivery in monochorionic compared with dichorionic twin pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(4):592–599. doi:10.1002/uog.23518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek L, Zhao DP, Te Pas AB, et al. Hemoglobin differences in uncomplicated monochorionic twins in relation to birth order and mode of delivery. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016;19(3):241–245. doi:10.1017/thg.2016.23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopriore E, Holtkamp N, Sueters M, et al. Acute peripartum twin-twin transfusion syndrome: incidence, risk factors, placental characteristics and neonatal outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(1):18–24. doi:10.1111/jog.12114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine. Practice bulletin no. 169: multifetal gestations: twin, triplet, and higher-order multifetal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(4):e131–e146. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overview | Twin and triplet pregnancy | Guidance | NICE; 2019 Sep 4 [cited 2023 Nov 27]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng137
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Shen H, Chen YT, et al. Experience in different modes of delivery in twin pregnancy. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0265180. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0265180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Health at a glance 2011: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing; 2011. doi:10.1787/helath_glance-2011-en.
   Google Scholar
• Deneux-Tharaux C, Carmona E, Bouvier-Colle MH, et al. Postpartum maternal mortality and cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(3 Pt 1):541–548. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000233154.62729.24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet Lond Engl. 1985;2(8452):436–437.
   Google Scholar
• Gazzetta Ufficiale. [cited 2023 Oct 3]. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio?dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2015-06-04&numeroGazzetta=127
   Google Scholar
• Belvis AD, Neri C, Angioletti C, et al. A multi-approach management intervention can lower C-section rate trends: the experience of a third level referral center. de Belvis A.G., Neri C., Angioletti C., Carducci B., Ferrazzani S., Lanzone A., Caruso A. J Hosp Adm. 2018;7:15–22. doi:10.5430/jha.v7n6p37.
   Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health (UK). Caesarean section. RCOG Press; 2011 [cited 2023 Oct 3]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK115309/
   Google Scholar
• Badr DA, Al Hassan J, Salem Wehbe G, et al. Uterine body placenta accreta spectrum: a detailed literature review. Placenta. 2020;95:44–52. doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadan MK, Ramadan K, El Tal R, et al. How safe is high-order repeat cesarean delivery? An 8-year single-center experience in Lebanon. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46(8):1370–1377. doi:10.1111/jog.14311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vayssière C, Benoist G, Blondel B, et al. Twin pregnancies: guidelines for clinical practice from the french college of gynaecologists and obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;156(1):12–17. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd JM, Crowther CA, Huertas E, et al. Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD004224. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004224.pub3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, et al. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevilacqua E, Jani JC, Meli F, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in breech presentation at term: a comparison between 2 third level birth center protocols. AJOG Glob Rep. 2022;2(4):100086. doi:10.1016/j.xagr.2022.100086.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parasiliti M, Vidiri A, Perelli F, et al. Cesarean section rate: navigating the gap between WHO recommended range and current obstetrical challenges. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023;36(2):2284112. doi:10.1080/14767058.2023.2284112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Collge of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Neonatal encephalopathy and cerebral palsy: executive summary. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):780–781. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000120142.83093.30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Emoto I, Maruyama S, et al. Twin vaginal delivery is associated with lower umbilical arterial blood pH of the second twin and less intrapartum blood loss. J Matern-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(19):3067–3071. doi:10.3109/14767058.2015.1118039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korb D, Deneux-Tharaux C, Goffinet F, et al. Severe maternal morbidity by mode of delivery in women with twin pregnancy and planned vaginal delivery. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):4944. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61720-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easter SR, Robinson JN, Lieberman E, et al. Association of intended route of delivery and maternal morbidity in twin pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(2):305–310. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• di Marco G, Bevilacqua E, Passananti E, et al. Multiple pregnancy and the risk of postpartum hemorrhage: retrospective analysis in a tertiary level center of care. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(3):446. doi:10.3390/diagnostics13030446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FIGO Working Group on Good Clinical Practice in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Good clinical practice advice: management of twin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;144(3):330–337. doi:10.1002/ijgo.12742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acheampong K, Pan X, Kaminga AC, et al. Risk of adverse maternal outcomes associated with prenatal exposure to moderate-severe depression compared with mild depression: a fellow-up study. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;136:32–38. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.01.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traylor CS, Johnson JD, Kimmel MC, et al. Effects of psychological stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes and nonpharmacologic approaches for reduction: an expert review. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020;2(4):100229. doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Rosenthal L, Auerbach MV, et al. Patient-provider communication, maternal anxiety, and self-care in pregnancy. Soc Sci Med. 2017;190:133–140. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar