The influence of obstetric intervention on trends in twin stillbirths: United States, 1989–99

REFERENCES

• Martin JA, Park MM. Trends in Twin and Triplet Births: 1980–97. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol 47, No 24. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Kogan MD, Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M, et al. Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization in the United States, 1981-1997. J Am Med Assoc 2000;283:335–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maternal and Child Health Bureau, United States Depart-ment of Health and Human Services. Trends in twin birth outcomes and prenatal care utilization. Dataspeak webcast. http ://www.uic.ed /sph /dataspeak/apr2001/apr2001_session. htm (accessed April 2001)
   Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Demissie K, Kramer MS. Obstetric intervention, stillbirth, and preterm birth. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:250–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Allen AC, Dodds L, et al. Causes and consequences of recent increases in preterm birth among twins. Obstet Gynecol 200198:57–64
   Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Marcoux S, Ohlsson A, et al. for the Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Changes in stillbirth and infant mortality associated with increases in preterm birth among twins. Pediatrics 2001;108:1055–61
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Health Statistics. 1989–98 Linked Birth/ Infant Death Data Set. CD-ROM Series 20, No 3–18. Hyattsville, MD: United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Martin JA, Hoyert DL. The national fetal death file. Semin Perinatol 2002;26:3–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffel SM, Ventura SJ, Gay GA. Revised US certificate of birth - new opportunities for research on birth outcome. Birth 1989;16:188–93
   Google Scholar
• Taffel S, Johnson D, Heuse R. A Method of Imputing Length of Gestation on Birth Certificates. Vital and Health Statistics Series 2, No 93. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 1982:1–11
   Google Scholar
• Yudkin PL, Wood L, Redman CWG. Risk of unexplained stillbirth at different gestational ages. Lancet 1987;1:1192–4
   Google Scholar
• Joseph KS. Core concepts in perinatal epidemiology: incidence of birth, growth-restriction and death. J Clin Epidemid 2004;in press
   Google Scholar
• Joseph K, Liu S, Demissie K, et al. for the Fetal and Infant Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. A parsimonious explanation for intersecting perinatal mortality curves: understanding the effect of plurality and of parity. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2003:3. http://www.bio-medcentraLcom/1471-2393/3/3 (a••-ssecl 26 June 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern H. Ecologic studies. In Rothman KJ, Greenland S, eds. Modem Epidemblogy, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams, 1998:459–80
   Google Scholar
• Kramer MS, Platt RW, Yang H, et al. Registration artifacts in international comparisons of infant mortality. Paedialr Perinat Epidemid 2002;16:16–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Allen A, Kramer MS, et al. Changes in the registration of stillbirths 5 500 g in Canada, 1985-95. Fetal-Infant Mortality Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System. Paediatr Perinat Epidembl 1999;13:278–87
   Google Scholar
• Soli RF, McQueen MC. Respiratory distress syndrome. In Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, eds. Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992:235–358
   Google Scholar
• Stevens TP, Blennow M, Soil RF. Early surfactant adminis-tration with brief ventilation vs. selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for RDS. Cochrane DatahasP Syst Rev 2002;CD–003063
   Google Scholar
• Crowley P. Prophylactic corticosteroids for preterm birth (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Fenton AC, Field DJ, Mason E, Clarke M. Attitudes to viability of preterm infants and their effect on figures for perinatal mortality. Br Med J 1990;300:434–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yawn BP, Wollan P, McKeon K, Field CS. Temporal changes in rates and reasons for medical induction of term labor, 1980-1996. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;184:611–9
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, et al. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of membranes at term. New Engl J Med 1996;334:1005–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Vanner T, Francis A. Gestational age and induction of labor for prolonged pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;104:792–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parry E, Parry D, Pattinson N. Induction of labor for post term pregnancy: an observational study. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 1998;38:275–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prysak M, Castronova FC. Elective induction versus sponta-neous labor: a case-control analysis of safety and efficacy. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:1056–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeast JD, Jones A, Poskin M. Induction of labor and the relationship to Cesarean delivery: a review of 7001 con-secutive inductions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180: 628–33
   Google Scholar
• Seyb ST, Berka RJ, Socol MJ, Dooley SL. Risk of Cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:600–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen CD, Miller AM, Rayburn WF. Influence of sponta-neous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus. Am J Perinatol 1995;12:63–6
   Google Scholar
• Zelop CM, Shipp TD, Repke JT, et al. Uterine rupture during induced or augmented labor in gravid women with one prior Cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:882–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior Cesarean delivery. New Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8
   Google Scholar
• Bahn SA, Jacobson J, Petersen F. Maternal and neonatal outcome following prolonged labor induction. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:403–7
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yancey MK, Henderson CE. US national trends in labor induction, 1989–98. J Reprod Med 2002;47: 120–4
   Google Scholar
• MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, Malloy M H. Trends and characteristics of induced labour in the United States 1989–98. Paedialr Perinat Epidembl 2002;16: 263–73
   Google Scholar
• Joseph KS, Kramer MS, Marcoux S, et al. Determinants of preterm birth rates in Canada from 1981 through 1983 and from 1992 through 1994. New Engl J Med 1998;339:1434–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananth CV, Joseph KS, Smulian JC. Trends in twin neonatal mortality in the United States: influence of obstetric intervention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;187:S135
   Google Scholar
• Zeger SL, Liang K-Y. An overview of methods for the analysis of longitudinal data. Stat Med 1992;11:1825–39
   Google Scholar