Linking action learning and inter-organisational learning: the learning journey approach

References

• Abbott, C., and C. Mayes. 2014. “Action Learning for Professionals: A New Approach to Practice.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1–9. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.874772.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, L., and R. Thorpe. 2004. “New Perspectives on Action Learning: Developing Criticality.” Journal of European Industrial Training 28 (8/9): 657–668. doi:10.1108/03090590410566570.
   Google Scholar
• Antonacopoulou, E. P. 2006. “The Relationship Between Individual and Organizational Learning: New Evidence from Managerial Learning Practices.” Management Learning 37 (4): 455–473. doi: 10.1177/1350507606070220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augier, M., and J. G. March. 2007. “The Pursuit of Relevance in Management Education.” California Management Review 49 (3): 129–146. doi: 10.2307/41166398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapuji, H., and M. Crossan. 2004. “From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organizational Learning Research.” Management Learning 35 (4): 397–417. doi: 10.1177/1350507604048270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boak, G. 2011. “Blending Q and P: Incorporating Action Learning in a Master's Programme.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 8 (2): 165–172. doi:10.1080/14767333.2011.581022.
   Google Scholar
• Boshyk, Y. 2002. “Why Business Driven Action Learning?” In Action Learning Worldwide: Experiences of Leadership and Organizational Development, edited by Y. Boshyk, 30–53. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Breen, J. 2014. “Exploring Criticality in Management Education Through Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1–21. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.874328.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, C. 2010. “The Role of the NHS in the Development of Revans’ Action Learning: Correspondence and Contradiction in Action Learning Development and Practice.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (2): 181–192. doi:10.1080/14767333.2010.488329.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. 2009a. “ Action Learning Within a British Business School: Meeting the Challenge and Grasping the Opportunity.” Paper presented at the Organisational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities Conference, University of Warwick, UK, April 26–28.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, E. 2009b. “Launch of Revans Academy for Action Learning and Research.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 101–103. doi:10.1080/14767330902731517.
   Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., and K. Xin. 2000. “Executive Education in the 21st Century.” Journal of Management Education 24 (1): 73–101. doi: 10.1177/105256290002400106
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., and D. Coghlan. 2004. “Action Learning: Towards a Framework in Inter-organisational Settings.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (1): 43–61. doi:10.1080/1476733042000187619.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., and D. Coghlan. 2008. “Codifying Implementation Guidelines for a Collaborative Improvement Initiative.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 5 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1080/14767330701880234.
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., H. W. Lane, R. E. White, and L. Djurfeldt. 1995. “Organizational Learning: Dimensions for a Theory.” The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3 (4): 337–360. doi: 10.1108/eb028835
   Google Scholar
• Crossan, M. M., C. C. Maurer, and R. E. White. 2011. “Reflections on the 2009 AMR Decade Award: Do We Have a Theory of Organizational Learning?” Academy of Management Review 36 (3): 446–460. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2011.61031806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, A., and M. Easterby-Smith. 2004. “From Reflection to Practical Reflexivity: Experiential Learning as Lived Experience.” In Organising Reflection, edited by M. Reynolds and R. Vince, 30–46. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Deiser, R. 2009. Designing the Smart Organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M. 1997. “Disciplines of Organizational Learning: Contributions and Critiques.” Human Relations 50 (9): 1085–1113. doi:10.1177/001872679705000903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterby-Smith, M., M. Crossan, and D. Nicolini. 2000. “Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present and Future.” Journal of Management Studies 37 (6): 783–796. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J., and J. Robson. 2014. “Action Learning on the Edge: Contributing to a Master's Programme in Human Resources for Health.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (3): 361–374. doi:10.1080/14767333.2014.950812.
   Google Scholar
• Eiter, M. 2009. Investigating Innovations in Curriculum Designs. A Unicorn Research Study: International University Consortium for Executive Education. http://mail.uniconexed.org/2009/research/Investigating_Innovations_in_CD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, H. D. 1996. “The Use of Action Learning in British Higher Education.” Education + Training 38 (8): 7–15. doi:10.1108/00400919610146270.
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2006. Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, J., and D. Ashton. 1994. “Action Learning and Academic Qualifications.” Management Learning 25 (2): 263–274. doi:10.1177/1350507694252006.
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., and S. Vangen. 2005. Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inkpen, A. C., and E. W. K. Tsang. 2007. “10 Learning and Strategic Alliances.” The Academy of Management Annals 1 (1): 479–511. doi:10.1080/078559815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., and D. P. Spicer. 2006. “A Case Study of Action Learning in an MBA Program.” Education + Training 48 (1): 39–54. doi:10.1108/00400910610645725.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., and A. Nicolai. 2005. “Success Factor Research: Overcoming the Trade-off Between Rigor and Relevance?” Journal of Management Inquiry 14 (3): 275–279. doi: 10.1177/1056492605279098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, L., and A. Pye. 2005. “Network Learning: An Empirically Derived Model of Learning by Groups of Organizations.” Human Relations 58 (3): 369–392. doi:10.1177/0018726705053427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1993. “The Practice of Learning.” In Understanding Practice. Perspectives on Activity and Context, edited by S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 3–33. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundvall, B. A. 1992. National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, M. 1996. Building the Learning Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, M. 1999. Action Learning in Action. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
   Google Scholar
• Miguel Pina e, C., C. Joao Vieira de, and C. Cabral-Cardoso. 2004. “Looking for Complication: Four Approaches to Management Education.” Journal of Management Education 28: 88–103. doi: 10.1177/1052562903252518
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers not MBAs: A Hard Look at the Soft Practice of Managing and Management Development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Naftalin, I. H. 1996. “Action Learning in Higher Education: Conflicting or Compatible Goals?” Educational Management Administration & Leadership 24 (2): 193–205. doi:10.1177/0263211×96242007.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, P. 2008. “The MBA Core Curricula of Top-Ranked U.S. Business Schools: A Study in Failure?” Academy of Management Learning & Education 7 (1): 108–123. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2008.31413868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., ed. 1997. What Do We Mean by Action Learning? A Story and Three Interpretations. London: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M. 2011. Action Learning in Practice. 4th ed. Farnham: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Pedler, M., J. Burgoyne, and C. Brook. 2005. “What Has Action Learning Learned to Become?” Action Learning: Research and Practice 2 (1): 49–68. doi:10.1080/14767330500041251.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, A. M. 1992. “The Character and Significance of Strategy Process Research.” Strategic Management Journal 13: 5–16. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. 2006. “Does Action Learning Promote Collaborative Leadership?” Academy of Management Learning & Education 5 (2): 152–168. doi:10.5465/amle.2006.21253780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 1972a. “Action Learning – A Management Development Programme.” Personnel Review 1 (4): 36–44. doi:10.1108/eb055215.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 1972b. Hospitals: Communication, Choice and Change: The Hospital Internal Communications Project Seen from Within. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 1982. The Origins and Growth of Action Learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 1983. The ABC of Action Learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 1998. A.B.C. of Action Learning. London: Lemos & Crane.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. 2011. ABC of Action Learning. Farnham: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C., and K. Trehan. 2004. “Reflections on Working with Critical Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (2): 149–165. doi:10.1080/1476733042000264128.
   Google Scholar
• Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation. London: Century Business.
   Google Scholar
• Starkey, K. E. N., and S. U. E. Tempest. 2009. “The Winter of Our Discontent: The Design Challenge for Business Schools.” Academy of Management Learning & Education 8 (4): 576–586. doi: 10.5465/AMLE.2009.47785476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trantom, J. 2013. “Developing an Action Learning Way of Working Within a Leadership Context in Higher Education: Barriers and Enablers.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 10 (3): 246–253. doi:10.1080/14767333.2013.840062.
   Google Scholar
• Upton, D. M., and S. E. Madacam. 1997. “Why (and How) to Take a Plant Tour.” Harvard Business Review 75 (3): 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., and C. Huxham. 2003. “Enacting Leadership for Collaborative Advantage: Dilemmas of Ideology and Pragmatism in the Activities of Partnership Managers.” British Journal of Management 14: 61–76. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8551.2003.00393.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ven, A. H. v. d. 1992. “Suggestions for Studying Strategy Process: A Research Note.” Strategic Management Journal 13: 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidaillet, B., and C. Vignon. 2010. “Bringing Back the Subject into Management Education.” Management Learning 41 (2): 221–241. doi: 10.1177/1350507609357392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince, R. 2004. “Action Learning and Organizational Learning: Power, Politics and Emotion in Organizations.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (1): 63–78. doi:10.1080/1476733042000187628.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R. 2007. “ Political Relatedness: The Fusion of Emotion and Politics in Action-Based Learning.” Paper presented to the Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities (OLKC) conference, University of Western Ontario, Canada, June 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• WDHB. (2015, September 6). “Methodology.” http://www.wdhb.com/en.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, K. 2002. “Action Learning: The Classic Approach.” In Action Learning Worldwide: Experiences of Leadership and Organizational Development, edited by Y. Boshyk, 3–18. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, R. 2003. “The Work of Strategizing and Organizing: For a Practice Perspective.” Strategic Organization 1 (1): 117–125. doi: 10.1177/1476127003001001221
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M. 2006. “Partnership Action Learning.” In Action Learning, Leadership and Organizational Development in Public Services, edited by C. Rigg, and S. Richards, 164–180. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, M. 2012. “Tension, Risk and Conflict: Action-Learning Journeys with Four Public-Sector Partnership Teams.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 9 (2): 167–176. doi:10.1080/14767333.2012.687914.
   Google Scholar