Turning to case studies as a mechanism for learning in action learning

References

• Argyris, C., and D. A. Schon. 1974. Theory-in-practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bapuji, H., and M. Crossan. 2004. “From Questions to Answers: Reviewing Organisational Learning Research.” Management Learning 35 (4): 397–417. doi: 10.1177/1350507604048270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoyne, J. G. 2010. “Evaluating Action Learning: A Critical Realist Complex Network Theory Approach.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (3): 239–251. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2010.518368
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., and P. Coughlan. 2010. “Notes Towards a Philosophy of Action Learning Research.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 7 (2): 193–203. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2010.488330
   Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., N. S. Rashford, and J. Neiva de Figueiredo. 2016. Organization Change and Strategy. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan, P., and D. Coghlan. 2011. Collaborative Improvement Through Network Action Learning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, N. 2014. “Argyris and Revans on Holding Meaningful Conversations” Action Learning: Research and Practice. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14767333.2014.945786.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonstone, J. 2015. “The Challenge of Evaluating Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 12 (2): 131–145. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2015.1041452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearty, M. 2015. “Beyond You and Me: Stories for Collective Action and Learning? Perspectives from an Action Research Project.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 12 (2): 146–165. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2015.1005572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, J. 2014. “Revans Reversed: Focusing on the Positive for a Change.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 11 (3): 264–277. doi: 10.1080/14767333.2014.936927
   Google Scholar
• Heldal, F. 2010. “Multidisciplinary Collaboration as a Loosely Coupled System: Integrating and Blocking Professional Boundaries with Objects.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 24 (1): 19–30. doi: 10.3109/13561820903078322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, M. 2003. “A Dynamic Model of Intra- and Inter-Organizational Learning.” Organization Studies 24 (1): 95–123. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024001684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., and J. D. Kirkpatrick. 2006. Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. 3rd ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., G. Park, B. Yoon, and J. Park. 2010. “Open Innovation in SMEs – An Intermediated Network Model.” Research Policy 39: 290–300. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leenders, M. R., and J. A. Erskine. 1989. Case Research: The Writing Process. London: School of Business Administration: The University of Western Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Levina, N., and E. Vaast. 2005. “The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems.” Management Information Systems Quarterly 29 (2): 335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, J. A. 2010. “Team Boundary Spanning: A Multilevel Review of Past Research and Proposals for the Future.” Journal of Management 36 (4): 911–940. doi: 10.1177/0149206309353945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavin, S., L. Lee, and F. Robson. 2010. The Evaluation of Learning and Development in the Workplace: A Review of the Literature. Bristol: Higher Education Funding Council for England.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. F. 2016. “Exploring the Importance of Team Psychological Safety in the Development of Two Interprofessional Teams.” Journal of Interprofessional Care 30 (1): 29–34. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2015.1072142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G. J., and Sydow, J. 2008. “Evaluating Inter-organizational Relationships.” In The Oxford Handbook of Inter-Organizational Relations, edited by S. Cropper, C. Huxham, and M. Ebers, 691–716. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raelin, J. 2009. “Seeking Conceptual Clarity in the Action Modalities.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 6 (1): 17–24. doi: 10.1080/14767330902731269
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M., and K. Trehan. 2009. “Critical by Design: Enacting Critical Action Learning in a Small Business Context.” Action Learning Research and Practice 6 (3): 305–318. doi: 10.1080/14767330903301807
   Google Scholar
• Ram, M., and K. Trehan. 2010. “Critical Action Learning, Policy Learning and Small Firms: An Inquiry.” Management Learning 41 (4): 415–428. doi: 10.1177/1350507609349155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1971. Developing Effective Managers. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1980. Action Learning: New Techniques for Management. London: Blond & Briggs.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1982. The Origins and Growth of Action Learning. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
   Google Scholar
• Revans, R. W. 1998. “Sketches in Action Learning.” Performance Improvement Quarterly 11 (1): 23–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1998.tb00075.x
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C. 2008. “Action Learning for Organisational and Systematic Development: Towards a ‘Both and’ Understanding of ‘I and We’.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 5 (2): 105–116. doi: 10.1080/14767330802185616
   Google Scholar
• Rigg, C., and Trehan, K. (2004). “Reflections on Working with Critical Action Learning.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (2): 149–165. doi: 10.1080/1476733042000264128
   Google Scholar
• Shani, A. B. (Rami), and Docherty, P. 2008. “Learning by Design: Key Mechanisms in Organization Development.” In Handbook of Organization Development, edited by T. Cummings, 499–518. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. 2005. “Qualitative Case Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 433–466. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vince, R. 2004. “Action Learning and Organizational Learning: Power, Politics and Emotion in Organizations.” Action Learning: Research and Practice 1 (1): 63–78. doi: 10.1080/1476733042000187628
   Google Scholar
• Voss, C. 2009. “Case Research in Operation Management.” In Researching Operations Management, edited by C. Karlsson, 162–195. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van de Vrande, V., J. P. J. de Jong, W. Vanhaverbeke, and M. de Rochemont. 2009. “Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges.” Technovation 29 (6–7): 423–437. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar