Revisiting metaphilosophical naturalism and naturalized transcendentalism: response to Kaidesoja

References

• Bardon, Adrian. 2006. “Transcendental Arguments.” Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed April 2017. http://www.iep.utm.edu/trans-ar/.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1975/1978. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 1979/1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bogen, James, and James Woodward. 1988. “Saving the Phenomena.” The Philosophical Review 97 (3): 303–352. doi: 10.2307/2185445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassirer, Ernst. 2005. “Hermann Cohen and the Renewal of Kantian Philosophy.” Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities 10 (1): 95–108. doi: 10.1080/09697250500225768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, Paul W. 2005. All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, Ronald N. 2008. “Naturalism.” In The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, edited by S. Psillos and M. Curd, 213–223. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glymour, Bruce. 2000. “Data and Phenomena: A Distinction Reconsidered.” Erkenntnis 52 (1): 29–37. doi: 10.1023/A:1005499609332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groff, Ruth. 2015. “Tuukka Kaidesoja on Critical Realist Transcendental Realism.” Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 341–348. doi: 10.1515/jso-2014-0050
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, G. W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, F. H. 2000. “On Transcendental Idealism.” In Kant’s Early Critics: The Empiricist Critique of the Theoretical Philosophy, edited by B. Sassen, 169–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2006. “Comments.” In “The Relevance of a Transcendental Mode of Inquiry: A Rejoinder to Kaidesoja” by Jamie Morgan. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2): 358–361.
   Google Scholar
• Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2013. Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2015. “Elaborating Naturalized Critical Realism: Response to Ruth Groff, Dave Elder-Vass, Daniel Little and Petri Ylikoski.” Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 359–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kaidesoja, Tuukka. 2017. “Reclaiming Naturalized Critical Realism: Response to McWherter.” Journal of Critical Realism 16 (2): 200–222. doi: 10.1080/14767430.2016.1255100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1997/2004. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kant, Immanuel. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Körner, Stephan. 1970. Categorial Frameworks. New York, NY: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Laruelle, François. 2012. From Decision to Heresy: Experiments in Non-Standard Thought, edited by Robin Mackay. Falmouth: Urbanomic/Sequence.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Daniel. 2015. “Fallibilism and Ontology in Tuukka Kaidesoja’s Critical Realist Social Ontology.” Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 349–358. doi: 10.1515/jso-2015-0009
   Google Scholar
• McWherter, Dustin. 2013. The Problem of Critical Ontology: Bhaskar Contra Kant. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McWherter, Dustin. 2015a. “Metaphilosophical Naturalism and Naturalized Transcendentalism: Some Objections to Kaidesoja’s Critique of Transcendental Arguments in Critical Realism.” Journal of Critical Realism 14 (1): 54–79. doi: 10.1179/1572513814Y.0000000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWherter, Dustin. 2015b. “Roy Bhaskar and Post-Kantian Philosophy.” In “In Memoriam: Roy Bhaskar 1944–2014” by Ruth Porter Groff, Lena Gunnarsson, Dustin McWherter, Paul Marshall, Lee Martin, Leigh Price, Matthew L. N. Wilkinson, and Nick Wilson. Journal of Critical Realism 14 (2): 124–127.
   Google Scholar
• McWherter, Dustin. 2016. “The Moore-Walker Dilemma: A Critique of Transcendental Idealism.” The Philosophical Forum 47 (2): 195–206. doi: 10.1111/phil.12114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. W. 2010. “The Transcendental Doctrine of Method.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 310–326. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pereboom, Derk. 2009/2013. “Kant’s Transcendental Arguments.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2014 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/kant-transcendental/.
   Google Scholar
• Pollok, Konstantin. 2010. “The “Transcendental Method’: On the Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in Neo-Kantianism.” In The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, edited by P. Guyer, 346–379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, F. W. J. 1994. Idealism and the Endgame of Theory: Three Essays by F. W. J. Schelling, edited by T. Pfau. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, Robert. 2011/2015. “Transcendental Arguments.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/transcendental-arguments/.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, Barry. 1968. “Transcendental Arguments.” The Journal of Philosophy 65 (9): 241–256. doi: 10.2307/2024395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylikoski, Petri. 2015. “Comment on Naturalizing Critical Realist Social Ontology.” Journal of Social Ontology 1 (2): 333–340. doi: 10.1515/jso-2015-0005
   Google Scholar