Critical realism and economic anthropology

References

• Appadurai, A. 1988. “Introduction: Commodities and the Politics of Value.” In The Social Life of Things, edited by A. Appadurai, 6–7. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, H. 2017. “Toward an Ethnography of the National Economy.” Cultural Anthropology 32 (2): 294–322. doi: 10.14506/ca32.2.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1982. “Morphogenesis Versus Structuration: On Combining Structure and Action.” The British Journal of Sociology 33 (4): 455–83. doi: 10.2307/589357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2000. Being Human: The Problem of Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 2003. Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2007. Making Our Way Through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, M. S. 2012. The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, J., and S. Uddin. 2015. “Management Accounting Research and Structuration Theory: A Critical Realist Critique.” Journal of Critical Realism 14 (5): 485–507. doi: 10.1179/1476743015Z.00000000079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. 2010. “Sharing.” Journal of Consumer Research 36: 715–34. doi: 10.1086/612649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1975/2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 2002/2012. From Science to Emancipation: Alienation and the Actuality of Enlightenment. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnington, O. 2015. “The Indispensability of Reflexivity to Practice: The Case of Home Energy Efficiency.” Journal of Critical Realism 14 (5): 461–84. doi: 10.1179/1572513815Y.0000000009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, L. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burling, R. 1962. “Maximization Theory and the Study of Economic Anthropology.” American Anthropologist 64 (4): 802–21. doi: 10.1525/aa.1962.64.4.02a00090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M. W. 2013. “Property.” In A Handbook of Economic Anthropology, edited by J. Carrier, 111–27. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Caillé, A. 2014. “Anti-utilitarianism, Economics, and the Gift-Paradigm.” Revue du Mauss [Online]. Accessed April 20, 2016. http://www.revuedumauss.com.fr/media/ACstake.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Carrier, J. G. 2005. A Handbook of Economic Anthropology. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chibnik, M. 2015. “Virtual Issue – Economic Anthropology: Introduction.” American Anthropologist [Online]. Accessed June 1, 2016. http://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1548-1433/economic-anthropology.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. 1966. “The Obsolete ‘Anti-Market’ Mentality: A Critique of the Substantive Approach to Economic Anthropology.” American Anthropologist, New Series, 68 (2), Part 1: 323–45. doi: 10.1525/aa.1966.68.2.02a00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyle, D. 2014. GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• da Col, Giovanni. 2015. “Incomplete Regularities: Comparison, Values, Personhood.” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (1): i–vii. doi: 10.14318/hau5.1.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, G. 1961. “Economic Theory and Primitive Society.” American Anthropologist 63 (1): 1–25. doi: 10.1525/aa.1961.63.1.02a00010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Translated by Janet Lloyd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2014. “Modes of Being and Forms of Predication.” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 271–80. doi: 10.14318/hau4.1.012
   Google Scholar
• Donati, P., and M. S. Archer. 2015. The Relational Subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2015. “Free Gifts and Positional Gifts.” European Journal of Social Theory, 18 (4): 451–68. doi: 10.1177/1368431014566562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endicott, K. 1988. “Property, Power and Conflict among the Batek of Malaysia.” In Hunters and Gatherers, edited by T. Ingold, D. Riches, and J. Woodburn, 110–27. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1940. The Nuer. A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Everett, D. 2005. “Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã.” Current Anthropology 46 (4): 621–46. doi: 10.1086/431525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, D. L. 2009. “Pirahã Culture and Grammar: A Response to Some Criticisms.” Language 85: 405–42. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P. 1991. Structures of Social Life: The Four Elementary Forms of Human Relations. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P. 1992. “The Four Elementary Forms of Sociality: Framework for a Unified Theory of Social Relations.” Psychological Review 99 (4): 689–723. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, T. 1985. “The Sharing of Substance Versus the Sharing of Activity among the Buid.” Man 20: 391–411. doi: 10.2307/2802438
   Google Scholar
• Giesler, M. 2006. “Consumer Gift Systems.” Journal of Consumer Research 33 (2): 283–90. doi: 10.1086/506309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godelier, M. 2004/2011. The Metamorphoses of Kinship. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski, P. S. 2013. “What Is Critical Realism? And Why Should You Care?” Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 42: 658–70. doi: 10.1177/0094306113499533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2001. Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. 2015. “Radical Alterity Is Just Another Way of Saying ‘Reality’ A Reply to Eduardo Viveiros de Castro.” Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 1–41. doi: 10.14318/hau5.2.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510. doi: 10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, C. 2009. “Whatever Happened to Economic Anthropology?” The Australian Journal of Anthropology 20: 285–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-6547.2009.00037.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudeman, S. 2008. Economy’s Tension: The Dialectics of Community and Markets. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hage, P., and F. Harary. 1996. Island Networks: Communication, Kinship, and Classification Structure in Oceania. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, C., and K. Hart. 2011. Economic Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2010. Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. Winchester: Zero Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harman, G. 2016. Immaterialism: Objects and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, M. 2007. “Introduction.” In A Realist Theory of Science, edited by R. Bhaskar, ix–xxvi. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, J., A. Smith, and D. Golightly. 2017. “Giving and Sharing in the Computer-Mediated Economy.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour 16 (4): 363–71. doi:10.1002/cb.1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, C., and E. Ostrom. 2003. “Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (S): 111–46.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, J. 1982. The History of the Hutterites. Winnipeg: W. K. Printers’ Aid.
   Google Scholar
• Hubert, H., and M. Mauss. 1964. Sacrifice: Its Nature and Function. London: Cohen & West.
   Google Scholar
• Janzen, R., and M. Stanton. 2010. The Hutterites in North America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An introduction to Actor Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, C. 1993. “Fuzziness and Phenomenology in Ethnological Research: Insights from Fuzzy Set Theory.” Journal of Anthropological Research 49: 17–37. doi: 10.1086/jar.49.1.3630628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauterbach, D., H. Truong, T. Shah, and L. Adamic. 2009. “Surfing a Web of Trust: Reputation and Reciprocity on Couchsurfing.” Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering 4: 346–53. doi: 10.1109/CSE.2009.345
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, T. 2003. Reorienting Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LeClair, E. 1962. “Economic Theory and Economic Anthropology.” American Anthropologist 64 (6): 1179–203. doi: 10.1525/aa.1962.64.6.02a00040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1949/1969. The Elementary Structure of Kinship. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, C. 1955/2011. Tristes Tropiques. Translated by J. Weightman and D. Weightman. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Longhofer, J. 1993. “All Things in Common: The Contingent Nature of Communalism among the Hutterites.” Journal of Mennonite Studies 11: 174–93.
   Google Scholar
• Malafouris, L. 2013. How Things Shape the Mind: A Theory of Material Engagement. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. 1922/1992. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mosko, M. 2010. “Partible Penitents: Dividual Personhood and Christian Practice in Melanesia and the West.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16: 215–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01618.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, R. 1971. Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, R. 1975. “Polythetic Classification: Convergence and Consequences.” Man 10: 349–69. doi: 10.2307/2799807
   Google Scholar
• Nevins, A., D. Pesetsky, and C. Rodrigues. 2009. “Pirahã Exceptionality: A Reassessment.” Language 85: 355–404. doi: 10.1353/lan.0.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2003. “How Types of Goods and Property Rights Jointly Affect Collective Action.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (3): 239–70. doi: 10.1177/0951692803015003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., and C. Hess. 2007. “A Framework for Analyzing the Knowledge Commons.” In Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice, edited by C. Hess and E. Ostrom, 41–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., M. A. Janssen, and J. M. Anderies. 2007. “Going Beyond Panaceas.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (39): 15176–78. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701886104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter, K., and I. Whitaker. 1981. “The Acquisition of Personal Property among Hutterites and Its Social Dimensions.” Anthropologica 23 (2): 145–55. doi: 10.2307/25605071
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1944. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. 1957. “The Economy as Instituted Process.” In Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, edited by K. Polanyi, C. Arensberg, and H. Pearson, 243–69. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. 2015. Reconstructing Sociology: The Critical Realist Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. 1965. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutzou, T. 2017. “Finding Bhaskar in all the Wrong Places? Causation, Process, and Structure in Bhaskar and Deleuze.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour doi:10.1111/jtsb.12138.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 1968. “On the Sociology of Primitive Exchange.” In The Relevance of Models for Social Anthropology, edited by M. Banton. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 1969. “Economic Anthropology and Anthropological Economics.” Social Science Information 8: 13–33. doi: 10.1177/053901846900800504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlins, M. 1979. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. 1954. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” Review of Economics and Expenditure 36 (Nov): 387–9.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited by K. Wolff. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, C., V. D. S. Sinha, J. Zinken, and W. Sampaio. 2011. “When Time is not Space: The Social and Linguistic Construction of Time Intervals and Temporal Event Relations in an Amazonian Culture.” Language and Cognition 3: 137–69. doi: 10.1515/langcog.2011.006
   Google Scholar
• Smart, A. 1993. “Gifts, Bribes, and Guanxi: A Reconsideration of Bourdieu's Social Capital.” Cultural Anthropology 8: 388–408. doi: 10.1525/can.1993.8.3.02a00060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K., and C. Humphrey. 2004. Property in Question: Value Transformation in the Global Economy. Oxford and New York: Berg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viveiros de Castro, E. 2015. “Who is Afraid of the Ontological Wolf?: Some Comments on an Ongoing Anthropological Debate.” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 33 (1): 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. 1991. “The Fractal Person.” In Big Men and Great Men: Personifications of Power in Melanesia, edited by M. Godelier and M. Strathern, 159–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberger, M. F., and M. Wallendorf. 2011. “Intracommunity Gifting at the Intersection of Contemporary Moral and Market Economies.” Journal of Consumer Research 39: 74–92. doi: 10.1086/662198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilk, R., and L. Cliggett. 2007. Economies and Cultures: Foundations of Economic Anthropology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1961. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar