References
- Bonell, C., E. Warren, A. Fletcher, and R. Viner. 2016. “Realist Trials and the Testing of Context-Mechanism-outcome Configurations: A Response to Van Belle et al.” Trials 17: 478. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1613-9.
- Callard, F., and D. Fiztgerald. 2015. “Why it’s Time to get Real about Interdisciplinary Research.” The Guardian, 14 October. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2015/oct/14/why-its-time-to-get-real-about-interdisciplinary-research.
- HEFCE (Higher Education Funding Council for England). 2017. “Interdisciplinary Research”. http://www.hefce.ac.uk/rsrch/interdisciplinary/.
- MRC (Medical Research Council). 2018. “Interdisciplinary Science”. https://mrc.ukri.org/successes/investing-for-impact/discovery-for-medicine/interdisciplinary-science/.
- Pawson, R. 2013. “Informed Guesswork: the Realist Response to Complexity.” Chap 5 In The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. London: Sage.
- Pawson, R. 2016. “The Ersatz Realism of Critical Realism: A Reply to Porter.” Evaluation 22 (1): 49–57. doi:10.1177/1356389015605206.
- Porter, S. 2015. “The Uncritical Realism of Realist Evaluation.” Evaluation 21 (1): 65–82. doi:10.1177/1356389014566134.
- Van Belle, S., G. Wong, G. Westhorp, M. Pearson, N. Emmel, A. Manzano, and B. Marchal. 2016. “Can ‘Realist’ Randomised Controlled Trials be Genuinely Realist?” Trials 17: 313. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1407-0.
- Various authors. 2015. Special issue on interdisciplinarity. Nature, 16 September 2015. https://www.nature.com/news/interdisciplinarity-1.18295.